USA wrote:
> On 31 Jan 2005 20:52:54 -0800, "bluesmama"

> wrote:
>
> >
> >conno...{at}hotmail.com wrote:
> >> Whats male privlege, like ending up in Arlington at 17. old gal
> >snail?
> >
> >I'll have to do some drugs before I can answer that. Maybe it will
help
> >me to understand what the fuck you're talking about.
> >
> >I have to apologize for all the cursing. Jack Daniel's will do that.
I
> >should have gone for tequila instead.
>
> You should apologize seeing you are the one as dumb as a box or
rocks.

I think you meant box of rocks. Maybe I should drink some more.

> Let's take it r-e-a-l  s-l-o-w because you obviously are stupid.
>
> Arlington....hmmm....a famous place...say in Virginia?  A national
> cemetery perhaps?   A place where military dead are buried with
> honors?

That was understood, though the sentence was so badly written.

> I'll explain further because you obviously are not only stupid but
> also drunk by your own admission above.
>
> Connor is *clearly* saying that cruel and nasty feminists like you
> consider it just fine for 17 year old "boys" and other older men to
> have the "male privlege" of being killed at war and buried in
> Arlington National Cemetery or other military cemeteries around the
> world.

Connor has no idea what I consider just fine. If my husband was
required to go to war, we'd leave the country. If my son was required
to go to war, we'd leave the country. You want to go to war and end up
in Arlington at 17, please be my guest.

> While at the very same time two-faced feminist whiners refuse to so
> much as have women be required by law to sign up for Selective
Service
> on their 18th birthdays the way all American men MUST.

That whole Selective Service requirement - who started that?
Gosh. I think it was a man. Perhaps he was dumb as a box of rocks.



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 2/1/05 6:10:09 PM ---