>or leave it.  I never wanted your whole life story, I just want to knopw 
who
  >you are.  That's all anybody on FidoNet ever wanted from you.  But you're 
so
  >paranoid you can't even tell us that.
Christopher, you do tend to speak for others....
Charles has included you and me in his accusations of a conspiracy to
get him kicked off AAC2. You, in your assertion above, are just as
incorrect as he is.
I couldn't care less what Charles is, and to a great extent he is
right, his position is irrelevant to most discussions.  Its when he
makes what some perceive as extraordinary claims, particularly in his
_interpretations_ of certain laws, his adamant stance on his opinions,
and the insulting manner that he confronts those that disagree with him
that we begin to require substantiation.  Since most of us are NOT
actively involved in law enforcement and have no basis for forming a
conclusion, his position in the LE community would go a long way in
establishing that credibility.
Please let me speak for myself in the "Charles" debate.
Ron
---
 þ QMPro 1.02 42-7029 þ Tried to play my shoehorn... all I got was footnotes!
---------------