From: "Rich" 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0157_01C74059.ABA91380
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

   You clearly did not read the Microsoft post and appear to be trying =
to respin one of the flasehoods from the bozo.  Try again.

Rich

  "Don Hills"  wrote in message =
news:8dJuFtgaX+oU092yn{at}attglobal.net...
  In article , "Rich"  wrote:
  >   the inquirer, such a bastion of truth and honesty.  They assert =
that
  >it "confirms everything" but beyond the assertion nothing.  This is
  >typical of them and false too.

  Your answer provides all the confirmation I needed.
  Note also the spin evident here:
  http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6286245.stm



  The MS FAQ carefully steps around addressing at least one of Peter's
  concerns. Let me see if I can describe a practical exmaple...

  Say I have a Quad-HD display (3840x2160) with my normal desktop stuff =
on it.

  It (or some component in the chain, such as the video card) does not =
have
  HDCP.

  I open a "protected" HD source in a window on the desktop in its =
native
  resolution (say, 1920x1080).

  I can expect the HD source to be displayed in a lower effective =
resolution,
  assuming it displays at all.

  Will the rest of my desktop be displayed in a lower resolution while =
the HD
  source plays?

  --=20
  Don Hills    (dmhills at attglobaldotnet)     Wellington, New Zealand
  "New interface closely resembles Presentation Manager,
   preparing you for the wonders of OS/2!"
      -- Advertisement on the box for Microsoft Windows 2.11 for 286
------=_NextPart_000_0157_01C74059.ABA91380
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable








   You
clearly did not read =
the Microsoft=20
post and appear to be trying to respin one of the flasehoods from the=20
bozo.  Try again.
 
Rich
 

  "Don Hills" <black.hole.4.spam{at}gmail.commailto:black.hole.4.spam{at}gmail.com">black.hole.4.spam{at}gmail.com
A>>=20
  wrote in message news:8dJuFtgaX+oU092yn{at}attg=
lobal.net...In=20
  article <45b5049c{at}w3.nls.net>,=20">mailto:45b5049c{at}w3.nls.net">45b5049c{at}w3.nls.net>,=20
  "Rich" <{at}>
wrote:>   the inquirer, such a =
bastion of=20
  truth and honesty.  They assert that>it "confirms =
everything" but=20
  beyond the assertion nothing.  This is>typical
of them and =
false=20
  too.Your answer provides all the confirmation I =
needed.Note also=20
  the spin evident here:http://news.bb" target="new">http://news.bb=">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6286245.stm">http://news.bb=
c.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6286245.stmThe=20
  MS FAQ carefully steps around addressing at least one of =
Peter'sconcerns.=20
  Let me see if I can describe a practical exmaple...Say I have =
a=20
  Quad-HD display (3840x2160) with my normal desktop stuff on =
it.It (or=20
  some component in the chain, such as the video card) does not=20
  haveHDCP.I open a "protected" HD
source in a window on the =
desktop=20
  in its nativeresolution (say, 1920x1080).I
can expect the =
HD=20
  source to be displayed in a lower effective resolution,assuming it =

  displays at all.Will the rest of my desktop be displayed in a =
lower=20
  resolution while the HDsource plays?--
Don=20
  Hills    (dmhills at =
attglobaldotnet)    =20
  Wellington, New Zealand"New interface closely resembles =
Presentation=20
  Manager, preparing you for the wonders of=20
  OS/2!"    -- Advertisement on
the box for Microsoft =
Windows=20
  2.11 for 286

------=_NextPart_000_0157_01C74059.ABA91380--

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5