wrote in message
news:1112207732.304717.32750{at}l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
> Hyerdahl wrote:
> > mark_sobolewski{at}yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > > > I can't really speak to the issue of "constant
rage" in women,
> but
> > > from> > the crime rates it appears that more men than women are
> > enraged.
> > >
> > > You mean the same crime rates that show that African Americans
> > > commit violent crime 10 times more against whites than vice-versa?
> >
> > I don't think the color of the skin matters;  if you commit a crime
> you
> > do the time, no?
>
> Then it shouldn't matter for gender either.  You lose the point.
>
> > > > If women FEEL rage, they seem to be handling it fairly well.

No, they just get away with unlawful conduct more. If females were judged by
the same standards as men, the majority of people in jail would be FEMALE.




> > >
> > > Yeah, it's neat that "neonates" are protected from
> > > their primary caregivers killing them via legal
> > > abandonment.
> >
> > There is no legal abandonment,
>
> >From a search on yahoo.com for "legal abandonment infant"
> "Infant Abandonment and Safe Haven Legislation"
>
> > Mark, but there are laws to protect
> > newly delivered neonates,
>
> >From whom?
>
> > who are either returned to their mothers,

Returned to their mothers? Returned from where? From being abandoned? lol


 or
> > adopted, a good outcome for all concerned.
>
> Compared to what someone might to do them otherwise?  Who would
> do such a thing? :-)
>
> > >
> So you're making a case for Choice for Men? :-)  If women
> have a greater involvement through gestating children
> then it can be argued that men have even less liability.
> Good going!

Females have a CHOICE. Men don't but are then held liable for the child. lol



>
> regards,
> Mark Sobolewski
>




--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/31/05 12:48:04 AM ---