"Hyerdahl"  wrote in message
news:1112195798.346388.261240{at}z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
>
> Ian wrote:
> > Mr. F. Le Mur wrote:
> > > On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 07:05:24 GMT, "MCP"
> 
> > > wrote:
>
> (edit)
> > >
> > This is feminism at its finest. Having disenfranchised the youth, and
> > removed the fathers, these lads take pleasure in simply upsetting the
> > womenfolk, and their neighbours. What else is there to do in the
> > evenings? Dance, or drink, or screw? There's nothing else to do.
>
> Are you suggesting that it is up to women to entertain bitter boys in
> order to keep them out of trouble's door?   Bitter boys are perfectly
> free to dance or drink even when they do get into trouble.  As to
> screwing, that is available if a woman is available, and only women
> decide if and when they are available.
>
> > The woman starts shouting, and lads like nothing more than a bit of
> > confrontation. No woman can mentally compete with young lads. They
> know
> > full well there's nothing she can do that can hurt them. They're
> > physically stronger, mentally tougher, and have nothing to lose.
>
> Brutish behavior simply doesn't go very far.  It reminds me a bit of a
> Rhino, big and ungainly, wanting to charge, but in the end, the only
> place for it is a zoo.  :-)
>
> > The woman on the other hand is now wrecked.
>
> What ARE you on about?  Women recover from brutish behavior quite
> easily, much the same as men do.
>
> The feminist state has simply failed her, she feels unprotected,
> violated, and abused. To the> lads it's a laugh because as men they're
> so much more tough than she> is, but to her, it's drove her mad.
>
> Who are you talking about?  What woman?
> >
> > The irony is, before feminism disenfranchised the men of the
> > neighbourhood, they'd have had enough investment in the local
> community
> > to just go out and fill these little cunts in.
>
> Women don't need to give men special rights in order to demand and
> maintain neighborhoods.  Women have the same access to laws, police
> protection and, in America, their own guns that men have, and...more
> women are buying and learning to use guns than at any other time.
>
>  Unfortunately, the government has completely lost the plot, Patricia
> Hewitt, and Harriet> Harman are both pointless wankers without a
> strategic bone in their> body, instead of actually encouraging men to
> keep the peace, and make the streets safe for the womenfolk, they've
> actually banned them from doing it. It's the same in education. "Men we
> want you to discipline these children, 'Our Way'" This is why there's
> no men in teaching, because feminists are such wankers. Look at Ruth
> Kelly for fuck's sake. When school was safe, how many heads were
> female?
>
> Hahahaha....now I see where this is going; you're upset that women
> aren't the teachers and men are not longer the principals.  :-)  Well,
> times have changed, dear, and female principals are there and the male
> principals are just as restricted in using brutish force as the female
> principals.
> >
> > Sure you can manipulate the education system, to value pointless
> > attributes, in order to make girls have a higher arbitrary mark in
> any
> > given field.
>
> The tasks necessary in today's society is what drives education.
> Companies simply don't need brutish fellows to man the fort.  They need
> people who can cooperate well with others on projects that are more
> comprehensive, using as much of both sides of the brain as possible.
> Perhaps that is what really chaps your hide, eh?
>
> (edit)
> >
> > When men drop out, men may lose, but women lose more. Women can have
> > all the houses, but who will then protect them from the homeless?
>
> Here in America, women can buy and use guns to protect them from anyone
> who threatens their lives.  Why would women give men special rights?
>
> > Sure you can jail a 12 year old for raping his teacher, but since
> > they've created the society which made the 12 year old, one of the
> 1170
> > lads born every day will just take his place.
>
> A gun has many bullets.  Of course, as one woman historian commented,
> the way to get rid of an ultra violent society is to send boys off to
> war, and that appears to be what Bush has in mind.  Sad tho.
>
>  Harriet Harman and> Patricia Hewitt's policies actually made this boy.
> He wasn't born a 12 year old rapist Clarice, he was made one.
>
> Lately, it appears that school and churchhouse shooters are raised in
> ultra fundy religious two parent homes, no?  What do you think THAT
> does to the psyche of a 12 year old?
>
> > All of this, just so girls can feel good about their ability in
> liberal
> > arts, en Patricia and Harriet can scare women into voting for them,
> > maar women are  forced out to work, in order that Harriet can stop
> > women ironing their men's shirts so they've got to do it themselves
> the
> > bastards.
>
> Women in America don't have time or inclination to stay home to iron
> men's shirts.  Women in America have freed themselves to pursue their
> own interests.   Working women have dominion and control over their own
> work product today.  Win-win.  And, more and more women will get into
> the sciences as more and more women enter them TOGETHER.  Women enjoy
> learning with other women.
>
> > In 1970 Feminism said "We can do anything. Men have it all, we'll
> > simply take it from them.
>
>
> Hahahahaha....Women ARE doing it all, Plus gestating.  It's not a
> matter of taking something that didn't belong to women; equal rights DO
> belong to women.
>
>  We'll destroy the family, and women can live their choices supported
> by welfare or whatever.
>
> Patriarchal families are a blast from the past; we laugh at them today
> and the families we are creating are more just and allow women to
> spread their own wings, enjoying life the same way men do.
>
>  We don't need men.
>
> Some men are wanted, which is much better than just being needed.
> Bitter boys are left alone, and that's why you're bellyaching.
>
> When we>want children, we can all just pick the best looking
"male",
> the one that will get us really wet like,and then have his kid and get
> rid of him.
>
> Yeah, I'm sure that's what women think and say to themselves as they
> walk down the isle.  :-)  In any event, if the guy turns out to be an
> egalitarian sweetheart, she would have little reason to "get rid of
> him".
> The men women are leaving are men who are sexists, and men who won't do
> their fair share of the unpaid work.
>
>  All the men we don't want, fancy, or need, well they can just pay
> > taxes to keep us, and they can be happy, and if they aren't, well let
> > them eat cake."
>
> ??????  Women pay taxes too dear.

No proof given (claim failed)






--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/30/05 12:47:52 PM ---