Ian wrote:
> Mr. F. Le Mur wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 07:05:24 GMT, "MCP"

> > wrote:

(edit)
> >
> This is feminism at its finest. Having disenfranchised the youth, and
> removed the fathers, these lads take pleasure in simply upsetting the
> womenfolk, and their neighbours. What else is there to do in the
> evenings? Dance, or drink, or screw? There's nothing else to do.

Are you suggesting that it is up to women to entertain bitter boys in
order to keep them out of trouble's door?   Bitter boys are perfectly
free to dance or drink even when they do get into trouble.  As to
screwing, that is available if a woman is available, and only women
decide if and when they are available.

> The woman starts shouting, and lads like nothing more than a bit of
> confrontation. No woman can mentally compete with young lads. They
know
> full well there's nothing she can do that can hurt them. They're
> physically stronger, mentally tougher, and have nothing to lose.

Brutish behavior simply doesn't go very far.  It reminds me a bit of a
Rhino, big and ungainly, wanting to charge, but in the end, the only
place for it is a zoo.  :-)

> The woman on the other hand is now wrecked.

What ARE you on about?  Women recover from brutish behavior quite
easily, much the same as men do.

The feminist state has simply failed her, she feels unprotected,
violated, and abused. To the> lads it's a laugh because as men they're
so much more tough than she> is, but to her, it's drove her mad.

Who are you talking about?  What woman?
>
> The irony is, before feminism disenfranchised the men of the
> neighbourhood, they'd have had enough investment in the local
community
> to just go out and fill these little cunts in.

Women don't need to give men special rights in order to demand and
maintain neighborhoods.  Women have the same access to laws, police
protection and, in America, their own guns that men have, and...more
women are buying and learning to use guns than at any other time.

 Unfortunately, the government has completely lost the plot, Patricia
Hewitt, and Harriet> Harman are both pointless wankers without a
strategic bone in their> body, instead of actually encouraging men to
keep the peace, and make the streets safe for the womenfolk, they've
actually banned them from doing it. It's the same in education. "Men we
want you to discipline these children, 'Our Way'" This is why there's
no men in teaching, because feminists are such wankers. Look at Ruth
Kelly for fuck's sake. When school was safe, how many heads were
female?

Hahahaha....now I see where this is going; you're upset that women
aren't the teachers and men are not longer the principals.  :-)  Well,
times have changed, dear, and female principals are there and the male
principals are just as restricted in using brutish force as the female
principals.
>
> Sure you can manipulate the education system, to value pointless
> attributes, in order to make girls have a higher arbitrary mark in
any
> given field.

The tasks necessary in today's society is what drives education.
Companies simply don't need brutish fellows to man the fort.  They need
people who can cooperate well with others on projects that are more
comprehensive, using as much of both sides of the brain as possible.
Perhaps that is what really chaps your hide, eh?

(edit)
>
> When men drop out, men may lose, but women lose more. Women can have
> all the houses, but who will then protect them from the homeless?

Here in America, women can buy and use guns to protect them from anyone
who threatens their lives.  Why would women give men special rights?

> Sure you can jail a 12 year old for raping his teacher, but since
> they've created the society which made the 12 year old, one of the
1170
> lads born every day will just take his place.

A gun has many bullets.  Of course, as one woman historian commented,
the way to get rid of an ultra violent society is to send boys off to
war, and that appears to be what Bush has in mind.  Sad tho.

 Harriet Harman and> Patricia Hewitt's policies actually made this boy.
He wasn't born a 12 year old rapist Clarice, he was made one.

Lately, it appears that school and churchhouse shooters are raised in
ultra fundy religious two parent homes, no?  What do you think THAT
does to the psyche of a 12 year old?

> All of this, just so girls can feel good about their ability in
liberal
> arts, en Patricia and Harriet can scare women into voting for them,
> maar women are  forced out to work, in order that Harriet can stop
> women ironing their men's shirts so they've got to do it themselves
the
> bastards.

Women in America don't have time or inclination to stay home to iron
men's shirts.  Women in America have freed themselves to pursue their
own interests.   Working women have dominion and control over their own
work product today.  Win-win.  And, more and more women will get into
the sciences as more and more women enter them TOGETHER.  Women enjoy
learning with other women.

> In 1970 Feminism said "We can do anything. Men have it all, we'll
> simply take it from them.


Hahahahaha....Women ARE doing it all, Plus gestating.  It's not a
matter of taking something that didn't belong to women; equal rights DO
belong to women.

 We'll destroy the family, and women can live their choices supported
by welfare or whatever.

Patriarchal families are a blast from the past; we laugh at them today
and the families we are creating are more just and allow women to
spread their own wings, enjoying life the same way men do.

 We don't need men.

Some men are wanted, which is much better than just being needed.
Bitter boys are left alone, and that's why you're bellyaching.

When we>want children, we can all just pick the best looking "male",
the one that will get us really wet like,and then have his kid and get
rid of him.

Yeah, I'm sure that's what women think and say to themselves as they
walk down the isle.  :-)  In any event, if the guy turns out to be an
egalitarian sweetheart, she would have little reason to "get rid of
him".
The men women are leaving are men who are sexists, and men who won't do
their fair share of the unpaid work.

 All the men we don't want, fancy, or need, well they can just pay
> taxes to keep us, and they can be happy, and if they aren't, well let
> them eat cake."

??????  Women pay taxes too dear.

>



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/30/05 12:47:52 PM ---