Hyerdahl wrote:
> mark_sobolewski{at}yahoo.com wrote:

> > > I can't really speak to the issue of "constant
rage" in women,
but
> > from> > the crime rates it appears that more men than women are
> enraged.
> >
> > You mean the same crime rates that show that African Americans
> > commit violent crime 10 times more against whites than vice-versa?
>
> I don't think the color of the skin matters;  if you commit a crime
you
> do the time, no?

Then it shouldn't matter for gender either.  You lose the point.

> > > If women FEEL rage, they seem to be handling it fairly well.
> >
> > Yeah, it's neat that "neonates" are protected from
> > their primary caregivers killing them via legal
> > abandonment.
>
> There is no legal abandonment,

>From a search on yahoo.com for "legal abandonment infant"
"Infant Abandonment and Safe Haven Legislation"

> Mark, but there are laws to protect
> newly delivered neonates,

>From whom?

> who are either returned to their mothers, or
> adopted, a good outcome for all concerned.

Compared to what someone might to do them otherwise?  Who would
do such a thing? :-)

> Mark doesn't seem to admire
> the fact that gestating women are dissimilarly situated to men and
> other women.
> Too bad.

So you're making a case for Choice for Men? :-)  If women
have a greater involvement through gestating children
then it can be argued that men have even less liability.
Good going!

regards,
Mark Sobolewski



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/30/05 4:47:46 PM ---