Hi Jorj:
JS>MC> Each of us uses the editor in different ways....  I'm sure SemWare
JS>  > will take your input into consideration in their next release.
JS> I doubt it.  More likely is will be circular-filed with a cheery
JS> "Hope this Helps!"  popular of late, and one which I loathe> or "Thank you for your
JS> input."
This has not been my experience.  SemWare has been incredibly receptive to
user requests.  There are dozens of features in TSE today because one or
two people asked for them.
JS> Like Larry Smith, I flatly disbelieve that not
JS> providing proper manuals was a cost-containment measure.  Ignore
JS> the fact that costs weren't at all contained, and that the
JS> SemWare editors are *damned* expensive, and that they bleed you
JS> at each upgrade.  A manual simply can't cost that much.  I have
JS> books on my shelf that are larger than the manuals; they cost
JS> five bucks.
Sure, you can find fiction books or some excess inventory stuff cheap.
In the volumes involved here, the manuals couldn't be duplicated for
5 bucks, much less produced.  I believe SemWare  decided to let online
help provide the guide to the new features because that is what a lot
of long time users have been asking for.
Assume SemWare has less in the way of
JS> mass-production savings, but conversely assume that the online
JS> help has to exist as ascii files which wouldn't take lots of
JS> massaging to turn into a decent manual, and they have to be able
JS> to have produced them.  That they didn't is a management
JS> decision; it can't be rationalized on the flimsy basis given.
I don't understand your argument here.  Are you suggesting that they
withheld manuals out of spite?
JS> Indeed, it's fairly clear from the slow-coming, crippled demo
JS> versions, that SemWare is sliding the editors out of the
JS> shareware market.
SemWare's product strategy is pretty straightforward:  If you want a
shareware editor, use TSE Jr. (aka Qedit).  If you need professional
features use TSE Pro.  TSE Pro has been from day 1 a "commericial"
distribution product.  I don't see any factual basis to assert that
they are sliding anything.
JS>MC> I do think that your idea of being able to print the docs is a good
JS>  > one.  Be aware, though, that printing the online would take about 650
JS>  > pages.  Even with my TSEBOOK macro, this is a lot of paper.
JS> The options were that they provide real printed manuals (most
JS> places that make them optional charge $5-10 extra from them) as
JS> options, and they default to sending full ascii docs.  In this
JS> case, they'd've probably done that for the Supplement and
JS> everything that comes under the "What's New in Version 2.5"
JS> rubric in the Table of Contents.  Someone estimated that the
JS> latter would be 60-70 pages: long, but not impossible.  And of
JS> course, given on-disk docs, one could print out the bits one
JS> wanted, as needed.
Ok, one by one here.
1) Most of the places that give you docs for $5-10 send you some thing that
they ground out quick, dumped off to a LaserJet, and sent out for 
dumplication.
TSE's manuals were typeset, well-bound, a completely different level of
product.
2) The 2.5 upgrade added a lot of features.  It didn't justify rewriting the
docs.
3) If you want to print off the new features, that's easy:
   1.  press 
   2.  select your topic
   3.  press the grey+ key      // copies the help text to your clipboard
   4.  press esc                // exit help
   5.  press the grey* key      // paste the block to your buffer
   6.  print the block          // prints it
   7.  delete the block
In fact, you could accumulate the topics and print them in what ever fashion
you like.
---
 þ SLMR 2.1a þ Artificial Intelligence is no match for Natural Stupidity
--- FidoPCB v1.4 [ff151/a]
---------------