FR>The whole issue I have been trying to bring up is that not one person has 
be
  >willing to directly contradict the stated published goals of the HCI (I 
neve
  >even heard of HCI until somebody posted a bogus letter on this list 
perporte
  >from them). It is always the same thing about "oh, it's their hidden 
genda
  >that is the real problem" That is not honest debate.  Publishing bogus 
lette
  >from HCI is also not honest debate.
Could you clarify this "bogus" letter you refer to, and how you know it 
is bogus?
FR>My opinion is that open and honest debate between pro and anti gun 
elements 
  >extremely important. I am aware that this appears to be a minority 
inion.
One of the few things we agree on!
 * 1st 2.00 #9525 * Good intentions randomize behavior.
--- QScan/PCB v1.19b / 01-0671
---------------