From: 808 

On Wed, 7 Sep 2005 00:43:11 +0000 (UTC), doctor{at}doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:

>In article ,
>Ian Salsbury  wrote:
>>
>>"The Doctor"  wrote in message
>>news:dfl1ib$j6p$13{at}gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>> In article ,
>>> solar penguin  wrote:
>>>>--- Yads said...
>>>>
>>>>> solar penguin  wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >Let's get this clear.  Martin Hosick thinks that
you think that Jackie
>>>>> >Tyler is a drug addict.  You say that this means
that he could be Mark
>>>>> >Gatiss in disguise.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >Why...?  Does Mark Gatiss often disguise himself
in order to accuse you
>>>>> >of thinking that Jackie Tyler is a drug addict?
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> FTR, I did not call JAckie Tyler a Drugs addict.
>>>>
>>>>Maybe not, but Martin Hosick _thought_ you called Jackie Tyler a drug
>>>>addict.  And that's why you said he was Mark Gatiss in disguise.
>>>>
>>>>But I'm still trying to work out the connection here.  Does
Mark Gatiss
>>>>really keep disguising himself as radw members in order to accuse you
>>>>of calling Jackie Tyler a drug addict?  What an exciting
life you must
>>>>lead...
>>>>
>>>
>>> Gatiss one of comedy's worst writers.  I HATE Little Britain!
>>
>>Little Britain is very funny. Gatiss didn`t write that anyway AFAIK. He did
>>co-write The League of Gentlemen, which is the funniest thing I`ve seen in
>>recent years. You hate The Simpsons as well IIRC, what on earth does make
>>you laugh??
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>Monty PYthon, The Goons and The 2 Ronnies.

So, nothing produced this century?

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5