| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Fatherhood faces stacked deck in family court |
Haha.... just think of the shit-fit women would throw if subjected to
being forced not to see their own children.
Women routinely reply that they birthed the child and therefore " own"
the child. A child is a person and cannot be owned. They claim to love
the child and then they wish to force to make someone else financially
support the child that they claim to love. The child becomes a burden,
financially. I would support my children on my own, so why can't these
whining single mothers looking for a payday just get a job and go to
work. Some women actually do this. But this is usually because the
thought of their ex seeing the child is even more of an incentive than
getting free money. This is just as twisted.
Many American women need a big fucking dose of the reality of a single
fathers existance in the US.
--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 2/2/05 10:14:51 PM ---
* Origin: MoonDog BBS, Brooklyn,NY, 718 692-2498, 1:278/230 (1:278/230)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786 @PATH: 278/230 10/345 106/1 2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.