"Ross Cassell -> Ross Sauer"  wrote in
news:30460$POL_INC{at}JamNNTPd:

 RS>>>> Just "disappointed?"
 RS>>>> Were you also "disappointed" with Bill Clinton?

 RC>>> The question would be, "were you?"

 RC>>> However I believe you took the what happens in his sex life is
 RC>>> his business viewpoint.

 RS>> True.

 RC> You should have been disappointed..

 RC> Especially after publically denying it...

 RC> Sanford at least didnt deny it.

Bullshit.
"Hiking the Appalachain Trail," anyone?

 RC>>> I guess the Repubs are hypocrites, running on family values
 RC>   then RC>> fucking up, like Sanford did..

 RS>> Bingo.

 RC> So since Democrats have no family values, you dont care when this
 RC> stuff occurs to them?

"Have no family values," like the Obama family?
Happily married with two little girls?

 RC> You spend all this time obsessing over a part of the platform many
 RC> repubs run on and you absolve the liberals because something is not
 RC> part of their platform.

 RC> Why is that, isnt adultery a bad thing, even for atheists?

Because it's a betrayal of trust.

 RC> The uproar over Clinton was if he could betray his wife, could he
 RC> betray...

Who? What?
Got anything to back this up, or is this yet another you pulled out of
your ass?

 RC> You should be laughing your ass off at all politicians that fuck up,
 RC> not just the hypen-R ones, but of course you are beholden to the
 RC> hyphen-D's, they keep giving  you that monthly check.. But of course,
 RC> I believe SSI was a curse tricky dick bestowed on us.

So?
You just *HAVE* to throw in the personal slam against me.
It's pathological in you.

--- Xnews/5.04.25