In article 
Jax  wrote:
>
> Anonymous  wrote in
> news:a5065b951f6808aba5beaebf7bd224c0@foto.nl1.torservers.net:
>
> > Dustin said:
> > "Not you hot-text, but our remailing friend.. They didn't always
> > use the remailer chain like they should have... And, that damn pgp
> > signature #### in this case worked against the person. It's
> > allowed me to identify a base ISP as the source. I'll soon have
> > the account holders name and addy, then it's my turn for some real
> > fun.
>
> Mr Anon that's one of my favorites. Dustin must have been completely
> out of his head if he thought anyone would believe that!   :)
>
> --
> Jax

DuckBull#### Was Dumbeth Enuf To Sayeth This Stupid:
"And, that damn pgp signature #### in this case worked against the
person. It's allowed me to identify a base ISP as the source. I'll
soon have the account holders name and addy, then it's my turn for
some real fun."

Duckdoo was/is so ignorant on the subject that he had no idea how
absolutely dumb his remark was. A PGP newbie who knew enough to sign a
post or e-mail would laugh himself/herself silly at DuckFart's total
ignorance of the subject and that ludicrous claim regarding finding a
"base ISP" in a sig file.


And DuckBull#### Also Sayeth:
"I have been using pgp since I was a teenager."

In the post below you can hear the little duck feet panic while
dancing up another OUTRAGEOUSLY STUPID LIE COMPILED OF IGNORANT
BULL####!

Enjoy!

http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?STYPE=msgid&A=0&MSGI=%3CXnsA175F0B73C725B7
Z317AGDTEHHI8AJ283%40no%3E
or
https://tinyurl.com/lq5glq7

Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx05.eternal-september.org!.PO
STED!not-for-mail
From: Dustin 
Newsgroups: alt.2600
Subject: Re: "that...pgp sig...allowed me to identify a base ISP..." IGNORANT
FOOL!
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 04:27:09 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: You must be joking
Lines: 77
Message-ID: 
References: 
Injection-Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 04:27:09 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org;
posting-host="1ed8a3cccae2355ec0d967e2b78b3814";
 logging-data="2481";
mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+L
CkRWW088wqqD3p86UT6Y"
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Face:
")a1c1@v4695TOAAGDV"2*Q?\^40C9=M@Fw'c:YhY])Sb=T`-ev$|P|4Kff_BGW@l:=$o}Ivdx{blP|
(XC-zAtj&8NNuo3Ie[v{NUwjU9Bf>sb*ylTx=^QUWZ|z\=w>zyeQ=2pWPz5M%]9-UrUud}+
Cancel-Lock: sha1:KVG9g+MjWYZbaOVyi3w/vyKCDcc=

Anonymous  wrote in
news:6398dc0abdf70a58ae20849db032a83c@breaka.net:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
> This fraud who says he KNOWS EVERYTHING...saying he has been using
> PGP since he was a teen, thinks that a PGP signature file contains

I have been using pgp since I was a teenager. You just don't seem to be
very good using google. That's probably why you're still trolling the
alt. newsgroups looking for juicy bits to repaste. You're really
limiting yourself there.

> information about someone's BASE ISP, whatever the hell the phrase
> BASE ISP means. (The ####### has remailer chains mixed up with PGP.
> He thinks each remailer hop has a separate ISP addy. What an
> #######. But this is what happens when you pretend to know stuff you
> don't have a clue about - even though he claims to have been using
> PGP since he was a kid. Again - he knows EVERYTHING. NOT!!)

I'm glad you think you know what I'm thinking and talking about. You
sort of remind me of Ray. He was going to educate me in assembler
programming. I suppose he, like you, thought! they knew wtf I was
talking about. Umm, he was wrong tho.

The pgp thing isn't a baseless claim tho. You just suck with google. I
can find posts I signed as a teenager. Why can't you? I'll give you a
little help in your quest; you need to be searching "fidonet". That's
"fidonet" like the dog.

I don't have any remailer chains mixed up, and what I said about base
isp has nothing really to do with PGP in so far as cracking or breaking
anything. anyone who can read/understand simple english knows exactly
what I meant when I wrote the material about base ISP information. It's
got nothing! to do with your PGP work, or your anonymous remailer
efforts.

So again, I did not claim! to have cracked PGP or anything else. I know
you aren't an exceptionally bright individual, but, you are using
remailers. :) Granted, with the help of quicksilver, but alas..

> ENJOY!

I do, tremendously. Speaking of enjoyment; have you heard back from the
RIAA yet? The rest of the crew wanted me to ask you that. We've been
watching the usual places since providing you our full release and
archive lists; nothing on the radar yet. We're counting on you. Don't
let us down.

Do you need another copy of the lists?

> "Not you hot-text, but our remailing friend.. They didn't always use
> the remailer chain like they should have... And, that damn pgp
> signature #### in this case worked against the person. It's allowed
> me to identify a base ISP as the source. I'll soon have the account
> holders name and addy, then it's my turn for some real fun."

That's indeed what I wrote. Nothing in it says I cracked anything. It
says, again, that you didn't do something correctly one time that I know
of. Atleast, I think it's you; but I'm not going to bull#### you, I
don't know for sure. So, walla; surprise, I haven't tried to do a damn
thing as a result. I waited two years to do anything about David Brooks.
I wasn't absolutely sure the information I had was good and I wasn't
about to do anything with it until I did.

Same with you. Although, I suspect you're some sorry #### from my past
anyway. Not a technical one, but someone I've pissed off in some
fashion. For what it's worth, your posting style is similiar to that of
PCbutts. If I knew for sure it was, well... heh, you already know what I
did to him about BugHunter.
-- 
My take home pay isn't enough to take me home!



--- NewsGate v1.0 gamma 2