On 05-02-10, WAYNE CHIRNSIDE said to BOB ACKLEY:



BA>> Where the h*ll have you been for the past half century or
BA>> longer?  The congress has been owned and operated by
BA>> various special interests for at least that long.  The
BA>> decision merely gives businesses a foot in that door.


WC> Been right here.


WC> I'm well aware of what you say and AGREE with it however
WC> it's just been made legal to make those "donations"
WC> AKA bribes UNLIMITED.


BA> Unions have been doing exactly that for decades, the decision merely
BA> levels that playing field.  FWIW I disagree with the limits on how much
BA> one can donate to a candidate (and note that there's no limit on the
BA> amount of a candidate's personal funds s/he can spend on him/herself).


WC>Another issue we're going to have to agree to disagree on.


WC>I loved the protection afforded by being in the communication
WC>workers union.


WC>Cheap at three times the dues.


Wait a minute.............


Weren't you just complaining about having to work at a place (Precisionaire, I
believe you stated) that had no union, and you couldn't move back to your home
state where there `were' unions, so you were taken advantage of terribly by
Precisionaire? Even being *forced* to dump what you at first called *toxic
waste*? But then, when it was pointed out that you were as guilty for `doing'
it, as the employer was for `ordering' it, you backed off saying it was some
*harmless* substance that didn't even qualify as much more than plain water?


The further you take this.....the more incredible (make that read
`unbelieveable') this sounds!


---
*Durango b301 #PE*