Path:
eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september
.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-septemb
er.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Galluping to a new leader 
Newsgroups:
az.politics,dfw.politics,ca.politics,austin.politics,misc.survivalism,guns.talk
.politics
Subject: Re: Coal miners ask Obama to stop 'absolute lies'
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 20:47:19 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 17
Message-ID: 
References:  
 
 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 02:47:12 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
posting-host="277361e339f8d0ae382789ff179fd29a";
 logging-data="3537";
mail-complaints-to="abuse{at}eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18OKHK4iqoR6eTgCOm8jRiRVySJ3SIX17o="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.9) Gecko/20121011
Thunderbird/10.0.9
In-Reply-To: 
Cancel-Lock: sha1:GT190VQXkxTs1Pv6956ESGfdQkw=
Xref: news.eternal-september.org az.politics:2643 dfw.politics:327
ca.politics:6287 austin.politics:72 misc.survivalism:23382

On 10/21/2012 7:05 PM, NotMe wrote:
> In the end the industy had to concede that the problem was not the EPA but
> that NG was so much cheaper that coal could not compete.

The problem _was_ EPA, which is why the regs were thrown out.

The solution is natural gas, but Obama doesn't like fracking.

He's going to ruin this nation's energy cost profile:

http://stateimpact.npr.org/pennsylvania/2012/05/04/obamas-newly-proposed-fracki
ng-rules/

Obama’s Newly Proposed Fracking Rules Opposed by Both Sides

http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/234577-white-house-gas-fracking-rule-o
n-track-

Top Obama energy aide: 'Fracking' rules coming by year's end
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.1