In article ,
connor_a{at}hotmail.com says...
>
> Society wrote:
> >  wrote in message
> > news:1107491392.408468.79820{at}g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> > >
> > >Carol Ann in her Hyerdahl3 guise barked...
> > >>
> > >> connor_a{at}hotmail.com revealed...
> > >> >
> > That'll shut up baying Hyerdahls who bark and howl
> > that it's men's fault when _women_ are irresponsible.
> > Sheesh.  Or maybe not.  The Blame the Victim mantra
> > is so hypnotically attractive to feminazis like Carol Ann.
>
> In 1988 I remember the scientists saying 'the male pill, yeah its
> undergoing research'.
>
> Well its fcking 2005, and the doctors are concerned the male pill will
> also beef up mens agression and muscle size (as side effects),
>
> So you betcha they won't release it!
>
There was a news report just a few days ago that described a
new possibility for the male pill.  It works by  reducing the
motility of the sperm,  not by using hormones to affect
sperm production.   Research is being done, and we can all
hope that it bears fruit in the near future.

http://www.pharmalive.com/News/index.cfm?articleid=208515&categoryid=15


> >
> > By the way, do you suppose that one of the reasons
> > so few resources have been put onto the problem
> > of providing men as many methods for controlling
> > their reproduction as women enjoy is that WOMEN
> > would go apesh*t (or bonobo-batty) over the
> > possibility of losing their control over reproduction?
> > Hmmm.
>
> Yup, firing blanks will certainly save men a shitload of cash! Perhaps
> we can shoot blood, puss and gastric juice into cunny to make em smell,
> smell, smell!!!
>
>


Mark Borgerson



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 2/4/05 2:21:38 PM ---