USA wrote:

> You claim to be the college brainiac, why do you ask so many stupid
> questions?  The other kind is YOU as Andre pointed out.  I didn't
> bother to do so because it was so patently obvious.

Claimed to take English in college, and can spell accurately most of
the time, that's about it for any claims of intelligence I've made.
Patently obvious? No, just patently rude and irrelevant.

> Funny how you take the egotistical credit for all matters of things
> you personally had no part in yet when someone gives a special bow
> (bow-wow?) to you, you act all shy and demure.

Show me where I'm taking credit for all matters of things I personally
had no part in.

> >> So go ahead and claim that you've whelped a baby or two dozen of
them
> >> if you like but it doesn't make you superior to a dog or a cow or
a
> >> rat or a squirrel or a man.  :-)
> >
> >I didn't claim it did. Perhaps your inferiority complex is showing.
>
> You have been doing nothing but a superiority dance about how women
> (of which you claim to be one) can whelp babies and (ha ha) men
can't.
> Further you claimed to have at least 2 female kids of your own along
> with all these shitloads of Pampers or Huggies.  Were you lying then
> or now?

Not a superiority dance, no. Just a recognition dance. Giving birth
(women don't whelp) is miraculous. Natural, yes. Easy, no. Superior to
digging coal? Definitely.

> Oh yeah...about the snarkly little inferiority complex comment from
> you above....I'm on the same team as you are.  I've left enough
> comments to this effect that even a feminist should have been able to
> figure it out.  I've also whelped my fair share of babies but unlike
> you, I didn't do it all by myself.  I could never have done it
without
> my beloved husband.  HTH.

Gender doesn't have anything to do with it. And we are most certainly
on different teams, whether or not we have the same general equipment.
But then again, maybe that whole whelping thing got me confused.

> >Check their DNA. Might be a surprise.
>
> So you agree that a large number of women are lying sluts when it
> comes to naming a father.  ;-)

I don't agree at all, as I think it's a mean-spirited, over the top
statement. Which of course you're quite free to make. The DNA comment
was a gift, pandering shamelessly to the anti-woman sentiment on the
board.



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 2/4/05 10:23:06 PM ---