JOE TURCZAK spoke thusly to: DICK ROEBELT
JT>DR> No law degree, but I do study law in my spare time.
JT>WHY?? hahaha, isn't it wuite boring??
Sometimes I think I may never get through some of the
text/opinions. The justices say one thing in one sentence and
something altogether in another. Trying to follow along can be a
chore. But I am not alone, even my atty's have a hard time
deciphering some of the "junk." But they have a leg up on me - they
take CLE's where some kindly person explains the opinions in everyday
English.
JT> Although I guess staying on top of it really would help! Most
JT>people break the law and do not know it! So that's a good thing
JT>I reckon!
One never stay's on top. A lot of what I read is for research and
I generally take the current opinion and work my way back on the
subject a hundred or so years.
JT>DR> Then a case in 1975 was heard. In Twentieth Century Music
JT>DR> Corp. v. Aiken the court held that the owner of a fast food
JT>DR> chicken store did not infringe by playing a radio connected to
JT>DR> four speakers in his establishment. The court said that the
JT>DR> reception was not a performance that belonged exclusively to
JT>DR> the copyright owner for a number of reasons (too deep to
JT>DR> enumerate).
JT>DR> Because of all the hair-splitting, the 1976 act inserted a
JT>DR> whole bunch of exemptions (one or two were to codify the Aiken
JT>DR> case). And I believe that if a person rebroadcasts (via the
JT>DR> telephone) and there is no commercial gain (for the
JT>DR> performance), that the equipment used (receiving apparatus) is
JT>DR> a "private home-type device," that the broadcast that is being
JT>DR> played is from a signal in the local reception area and there
JT>DR> is no "direct charge" for the listening - then folks who pipe
JT>DR> the music into their phone system have little to worry about.
JT>Ok, but what about where I work we have a local radio station on
JT>our hold system. I'm sure it's not a private home type device,
Is it a std type radio you can buy at Radio Shack, Circuit City,
Walmart, etal? If it is, then it meets the definition.
Professional equipment commonly found at a radio station, DJ
equipment, professional broadcast gear found in bistro's, nightclubs
and the like would normally fall outside the "home-type" definition.
JT>but it isn't for our financial gain - I think we'd be putting
JT>an ad or soemthing on there if it were to get the customer to
JT>buy more stuff from us, or to tell about our sales or something!
JT>So I would say it's just for thier entertainment while they are
JT>on hold. Ths seems ok to me though!
You are probably in the clear. But I ain't no lawyer , so read
my post with a jaundiced eye, as it were.
Dick
Join the army, meet interesting people, kill them.
þ CMPQwk 1.42 84 þ
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/Wildcat5! v2.0GI
---------------
* Origin: Doc's Place, All The Fido! (813) 827-9407 (1:3603/140)
|