RT>Nope.  No cigar Charles.  This here is a PUBLIC echo.  I've not
  >addressed you nor your affairs other than in this medium.  The issues
  >concerning your credibility are a direct result of your postings,
  >REGARDLESS of your paranoid fantasies to the contrary.
No, Ron; you don't even come close to getting the brass ring.  The
issue of whether or not I had to prove my credentials was decided by
the moderator, according to the rules, a long time ago.  Yet you 
persist, with others to repeatedly harrass me by trying to belittle me
and raise questions about my credentials for your own little purposes 
and agenda.
  >3.  You make assumptions that have no foundation.
RT>My _assumptions_ have plenty of foundation.  But I'll have to admit that
  >my allegations (that you are an impostor) have no _substantiation_ since
  >one can't possibly prove a negative.  Half a point for you.
Your own statement(s) condemn you.
  >4.  You speak for Leos when YOU are not a Leo or their designated
  >agent.
RT>This'un you gotta back up.  I, like yourself, claim to have HAD law
  >enforcement experience some 25 to 30 years ago.  Otherwise I, unlike
  >yourself, have never spoken as a LEO nor for one.  Please show us when I
  >did or apologize.
Considering the nature of the echo, the only one(s) who have any real
gripe (if any could exists) would be the actual, current Leos who are
the heart of the conference.  You are not one of them.
RT>Agitator?  Hmmmmmmm..... well I guess I gotta admit that I do enjoy
  >debunking would-be authorities when they are in fact full of it.  As for
You admitted a few sentences ago that you could not possibly 
substantiate your assertions in this regard.  Would be authorities?  
Funny that no real LEOS have made any serious challenges to any of my
posts other than to discuss their OPINION and my OPINION.
RT>no delusions about it, I'd just like to get rid of the impostors who
  >continually disrupt the normal flow of conversations with their B.S.
  >(Thats you Charles).
No, Ron; you haven't debunked anything.  You started on a course of 
action that ignored the decisions of the moderator in the past; and I
assume that is because you think YOU are the moderator or that you 
should be the moderator.  It's pretty clear that all of your posts 
concerning my credentials were off topic and in violation of the rules.
RT>Ah... pardon me while I slip into this phone booth and change into my
  >cape and leotards.
I'll bet they are pink.
CHARLES HUNTER
 * 1st 2.00 #9124 * Real men don't set phasers on stun...
--- QScan/PCB v1.19b / 01-0671
---------------