| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Windows Server 2003 really is faster than Linux |
From: "Geo."
"Joe Barr" wrote in message
news:pan.2003.05.11.08.23.32.16006{at}austin.rr.com...
> And that view is much reduced from the one MS is trying to sell.
and from the one you were trying to sell. One of the things you should have
asked the samba guy was why does raid0 suck on linux and is that being
addressed. Give him a chance to say "yes it's an area that needed
attention and now it's getting it" so that the linux world understands
the authors are capable of seeing the problems and addressing them. That
will convince people it's a good platform far more than knocking MS
benchmark requirements.
One of the things I used to really like about NT was that the NT team would
do just that. They would admit something sucked and get to work on fixing
it in the next version.
Geo.
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/1.45)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/1 106/1 2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.