To: trekcreative{at}yahoogroups.com
From: DarkHrzn91701{at}aol.com
Reply-To: trekcreative{at}yahoogroups.com
--part1_182.1e6723a8.2c53628f_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In a message dated 7/25/03 8:41:59 PM CDT, jayphailey{at}tic1.net writes:
> I compare the reworking to a slow evolution to "Bay watch on
> a space ship" because someone has the idea that people
> watching Trek are stupid.
That does appear where the clueless twins (B&B) are headed. It's
obvious they hold nothing but contempt for the fans. Several comments
Berman has made since Nemesis have pretty much confirmed that.
You'd think they'd realize that "fans" = "viewers" but
not those two.
They won't listen to the fans, they don't know why the ratings have tanked,
they don't see bad box office as an indicator, the fact Activision wants
out of their Trek contracts is just some incidental occurance, the lack of
Trek merchandise at places like ToysRUs doesn't even appear on their radar
screen, Enterprise wasn't even close to being nominated for best dramatic
series, they get continual bad reviews and not just from TV Guide... By
what measure do they gauge their success or failure by?
-Michael Gray
Star Trek: Dark Horizon
http://hometown.aol.co" target="new">http://hometown.aol.co">http://hometown.aol.com/darkhrzn91701/main.htm">http://hometown.aol.co
m/darkhrzn91701/main.htm
--part1_182.1e6723a8.2c53628f_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In a message dated 7/25/03 8:41:59 PM CDT,
jayphailey{at}tic1.net writes:
> I compare the reworking to a slow evolution to "Bay watch on
> a space ship" because someone has the idea that people
> watching Trek are stupid.
That does appear where the clueless twins (B&B) are
headed. It's obvious they hold nothing but contempt for
the fans. Several comments Berman has made since
Nemesis have pretty much confirmed that.
You'd think they'd realize that "fans" = "viewers" but
not those two.
They won't listen to the fans, they don't know why the ratings
have tanked, they don't see bad box office as an indicator, the
fact Activision wants out of their Trek contracts is just
some incidental occurance, the lack of Trek merchandise at places
like ToysRUs doesn't even appear on their radar screen,
Enterprise wasn't even close to being nominated for best dramatic
series, they get continual bad reviews and not just from TV
Guide... By what measure do they gauge their success or failure
by?
-Michael Gray
Star Trek: Dark Horizon
http://hometown.aol.co" target="new">http://hometown.aol.co">http://hometown.aol.com/darkhrzn91701/main.htm">http://hometown.aol.co
m/darkhrzn91701/main.htm
Yahoo! Groups
Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
http://rd.yahoo.com/M=256694.3636030.4902496.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=170
5019987:HM/A=1688501/R=0/SIG=11if1rb57/*http://webevents.yahoo.com/universal/se
abiscuit/" target=_top> http://webevents.yahoo.com/universal/seabiscuit/lrec/noflash.gif"
width=300 height=250 border=0>
http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=2566
94.3636030.4902496.1261774/D=egroupmail/S=:HM/A=1688501/rand=679425797">
tr>
Star Trek; The E-mail Commands
Post message: trekcreative{at}yahoogroups.com Subscribe:
trekcreative-subscribe{at}yahoogroups.com Unsubscribe:
trekcreative-unsubscribe{at}yahoogroups.com List owner:
trekcreative-owner{at}yahoogroups.com Get Digest:
trekcreative-digest{at}yahoogroups.com Web only:
trekcreative-nomail{at}yahoogroups.com Normal:
trekcreative-normal{at}egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/">Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
--part1_182.1e6723a8.2c53628f_boundary--
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
* Origin: Email Gate (1:379/100)
SEEN-BY: 633/267 270
@PATH: 379/100 101 1 10/345 106/1 2000 633/267
|
|
SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com
|
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.
don't click this!
|