On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 23:25:23 -0500, Phil  wrote:

>On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 00:55:19 GMT, Dionisio
> wrote:
>
>>wbt{at}privacy.net wrote:
>>
>>>Bull Shit! That's without question a homosexual posit. Everyone knows
>>>It's the one you assume when preparing to have the lard applied prior
>>>to a serious fisting session.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Put the Crisco away, please. A) I've never been able to understand the
>>activity, B) I'm way too tight for it even if I was curious, and C) You
>>haven't even wined and dined me.
>
>wbt whines a lot in these newsgroups.


Get your head out of your ass. Look around you. Remember all the
sexual abuse done by the homosexual priest in the Catholic church? Now
the very same homosexually dominated APA that says homosexuals are
"Alright" wants us to think the same thing about Pedophiles.

			*******

Is Pedophilia The Next "Sexual Orientation" To Be Normalized

Washington, DC - The "Sexual Orientation" lobbyists are at it again.
In mid-May, members of the American Psychiatric Association (APA) met
in San Francisco and listened to a psychiatrist argue for the
declassification of paedophilia, fetishism, transvestism, voyeurism,
and sadomasochism from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental
Disorders (DSM-IV-TR).

Dr. Charles Moser with San Francisco's Institute for the Advance Study
of Human Sexuality (IASHS) and Dr. Peggy Kleinplatz with the
University of Ottawa, presented a paper entitled: "DSM-IV-TR and the
Paraphilias: An Argument for Removal." (Moser's IASHS is a
Kinsey-based sexologist training group that approves of homosexuality,
pornography, sadomasochism, and other deviant sexual practices.)

Moser and Kleinplatz argued that these various sexual interests are
culturally or religiously forbidden-and thus should not be considered
mental illnesses. They claimed that because psychiatry has no baseline
to determine what is normal or abnormal behavior, these sexual
behaviors should no longer be stigmatized.

Over the past few years, the APA has done several flip flops on its
position on pedophilia as a mental disorder. According to Linda Ames
Nicolosi, the APA's DSM-III maintained that merely acting upon sexual
urges against children is sufficient to earn a diagnosis of
pedophilia.

****However, in the DSM-IV, the APA changed the definition. It claimed
that only if a person experienced significant stress or social
impairment, would his sexual attraction to children be considered
pedophilia. In other words, if the person felt no remorse for
molesting kids, he wasn't really a paedophile.*****

Is this really how the APA wants to define what is and isn't a mental
disorder? If a person doesn't feel bad about his behavior, then he's
normal. Using this definition, one could say that a person who feels
no emotional discomfort from having sex with dead people or animals is
perfectly normal. Would APA psychiatrists argue that the homosexual
Jeffrey Dahmer was a normal person because he felt no remorse or
social impairment for cannibalizing his sex victims?

Has the psychiatric community gone insane? After bad publicity over
this watered-down definition of pedophilia, the APA again flip flopped
and issued a statement saying that pedophilia was morally wrong.

The debate, however, continues within the APA with the Sexual
Orientation lobbyists working feverishly to normalize what most
rational humans would consider serious mental disorders and sexual
dysfunctions.

The leaders of the North American Man Boy Love Association (NAMBLA),
the Christian Boy-Love Forum, Girl Love Garden, and Philia (all
paedophile web sites) must be pleased with the debate going on within
the APA.

But will children?




>
>Phil
>======
>visit the New York City Homebrewers Guild website:
>http://www.hbd.org/nychg



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 2/8/05 2:35:40 AM ---