JD>    I want people to think for themselves, and not just listen to
 JD> what Wardell thinks. Everytime someone reposts his post, and add
 JD> the comment "Now it really is over." (or something similar) then
 JD> he gets what he wants. The way I see it, adding a "What do you
 JD> think?" is a much neater approach.

Many years agoo:

It rumors very often: OS/2 is dead - some time later OS/2 2.0 arrives the
world

Some time later:

It rumors very often: OS/2 is dead - some time later OS/2 2.1 arrives the
world

Some time later:

It rumors very often: OS/2 is dead - some time later OS/2 2.11 arrives the
world

Some time later:

It rumors very often: OS/2 is dead - some time later OS/2 WARP 3 arrives the
world

Some time later:

It rumors very often: OS/2 is dead - some time later OS/2 WARP 4 arrives the
world

OS/2 is going on.

Somebody in IBM my cry: OS/2 IS DEAD - But IBM is like other. The left hand
does not know what the right hand is doing,

Independant of that. So long as OS/2 does what I need that it has to do OS/2
is living.

--- Sqed/32 1.14/development
280/801