On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 17:23:02 -0800, "Society"
 wrote:

>
>"Casey"  wrote in message
>news:d_yNd.10964$gA4.3928{at}edtnps89...
>>

>> let alone a social benefit which equals or exceeds
>> the clear socially detrimental effects of perpetrating
>> such a restrictive bias against a portion of the general
>> population.
>
>What "clear socially detrimental effects" are you
>yammering about, Casey?  Were they so "clear"
>I'd see 'em at a glance but I don't.  However, the
>"social benefit" of cultural, social and political
>support for the majority heterosexual population
>is obvious to anyone -- just look around you.

I'll worry about the "bias" when children can get married.

>
>Yeah, YOU were born too, but as my libertarian
>friends say, "Utopia is not an option."  Heh heh heh.

Sowell argues that marriage is not a "right," but
a voluntary loss of rights, and that...
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/thomassowell/ts20041231.shtml
  "What the activists really want is the stamp of acceptance
  on homosexuality, as a means of spreading that lifestyle,
  which has become a death style in the era of AIDS."



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 2/9/05 2:42:10 PM ---