-> MF> How much does this zero stuffing affect cps?
->
-> 50-100 or so cps (as measured on fully compressed files greater than
-> 130kb) Seems to vary as with the age of build of the BT-LZ
-> algorithms used too
Hmm, interesting.
-> -> If by better you mean better for maintaining a higher thruput on d
-> -> lines then, in the absence of LAP-M with SREJ, MNP10's good, since
-> -> it'll go down to 8 byte resends.  But it does carry more overhead.
-> MF> I thought that MNP10 was a cellular protocol.
->
-> MNP10 on its own is just the error correction without the line level
-> dynamic link.  Its slow speed startup is either 1k2, 4k8, or max
-> speed the link will support
So it would not be wise to use it.
--- Platinum Xpress/386/Wildcat! v1.3
---------------