wrote in message
news:1108018094.485664.229740{at}c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Many feminists argue that prohitibition of prostitution and polygamy
> protect women's right.
>
> What right is protected by prohibiting consensual offers from males?
>
> What about women that want several husband? What about women that would
> rather share a handsome, smart, rich male than be the only one for a
> poor dumb violent one?
>
> How many females got beaten up by violent dumb males because those
> females do not have enough loving billionares playboy to pick?
>
> What about women's right to rent her womb or cunt to the highest
> bidder? What about women's right to choose any rich males that want to
> have sex with her for money?
>
> Without prohibition of consensual acts, women that got beaten up just
> once by a boyfriend, can say, "fuck it I am done", and quickly choose
> to become a misress for a loving rich male. No need to count on cops or
> anything. Those violent bastard were lucky if they got chosen in the
> first place.
>
> In many countries where genital multilation is common,
> The more a male doesn't have positive intensive to mate with females,
> the more likely the male would, out of jealousy, use negative
> intensives to keep women in line.
>
> In many countries, women face genital mutilation, burned alive, etc.
> Without prohibition of prostitution, women can quickly go to males that
> can resort to positive intensives, like money, to persuade females,
> rather than negative intensives motivated by jealousy.
>
> Without regulation against consensual acts, women also have more
> choices to earn quick money and become financially independent by
> performing in strip clubs, selling virginity, etc.
>
> Also, I believe the true purpose of anti prostitution, anti polygamy,
> and child support law is to take away choices from females. It's there
> to ration females to less desirable poorer financially irresponsible
> males.
>
> I am not against women being financially independent. 50% of females
> are smarter than 50% of males. So yes, women can be anything they want
> too. Engineer, astronout, boxer, nude boxer, etc. However, women will
> be better of even further if they can take advantage of monetary
> consensual offers from males.
>
> Christian would love this too. When prostitution is allowed, women can
> say, I'll bear a baby for $1 million. Now, which women would abort
> their baby if good rich daddy will pay her $1 million for delivering
> his.
>
> Not just money. The rich often carry better genes. Women are more
> likely to abort their baby when the quality of the sperm that knock her
> up is low. If a woman have a potentially genius baby, why abort it?
>
> It's a win win solution. The only person that got anything to lose is
> the less desirable poor males. Ugly feminists that are jealous of what
> pretty women can achieve might also disagree, but even they can aim
> "higher" without sex regulation. But fuck them. Women can vote too
> right? Vote for freedom. Vote for women choice! Vote libertarian
> solutions.
>
Why don't you go back to the kitchen and hack your patch!!!!




--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 2/10/05 6:45:05 AM ---