| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Windows Server 2003 really is faster than Linux |
From: "Rich"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_01F7_01C31739.E6286E90
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I don't know what you mean by "finely tuned". If you want to tune =
differently, go ahead.
Rich
"Geo." wrote in message
news:3ebdb58a{at}w3.nls.net...
"Rich" wrote in message news:3ebd9381$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> Not for file system as NTFS is the default. For others, the OS
defaults are for a mix of applications and tuning made for file server
performance may not be appropriate for terminal services. Microsoft
documents the performance tuning suggestions it makes. See
=
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/techinfo/reskit/en-us/core/fnee_exa_=
sfsu.asp
for an example.<<
You can't be serious, disable 8.3 filenames, disable last updated =
updating,
and disable some perfmon counters and this is supposed to be "finely =
tuned"?
That's like removing the spare tire, sun visors and wool seat covers =
and
claiming you reduced the weight of the car so it's faster.
I could make more of a difference tweaking the RWIN value and =
disabling
non-essential services.
Geo.
------=_NextPart_000_01F7_01C31739.E6286E90
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I don't
know what you mean =
by "finely=20
tuned". If you want to tune differently, go
ahead.
Rich
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/1.45)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/1 106/1 2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.