From: Adam Flinton 

It's not selective editiing it's trying to keep the quoteback size down (a
foreign concept to you I accept).

Re RH I was unaware that they were the fount of all knowlegedge & the
sole distributor of linux.

Adam


Rich wrote:
>    Adam, must you really selectively edit to keep from looking the
> fool.  I'll repeat my message.  If you want to say that ext3 is
> inappropriate, how about you point out in redhat's customization guide
> where redhat suggests so.
>
>
>        Not for file system as NTFS is the default.  For others, the OS
>     defaults are for a mix of applications and tuning made for file
>     server performance may not be appropriate for terminal services.
>     Microsoft documents the performance tuning suggestions it makes.
>     See
>     http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/techinfo/reskit/en-us/core/fnee_exa_
sfsu.asp
>     for an example.
>
>        Maybe you want to point out similar recomendations in redhat's
>     configuration guide at
>     http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/linux/RHL-8.0-Manual/custom-guide/.
>
>
> Rich
>
>
>
>     "Adam Flinton"      > wrote in message
>     news:3ebe2445{at}w3.nls.net...
>     Rich wrote:
>      >    Not for file system as NTFS is the default.
>
>     &? If your argument was "don't blame the testers for
sticking with the
>     RH defaults" then why didn't they stick with the MS/Win2k3 defaults?
>
>
>      >   For others, the OS
>      > defaults are for a mix of applications and tuning made for file
>     server
>      > performance may not be appropriate for terminal services.
>
>
>     Maybe ext3 was not appropriate either?
>
>     Adam

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4