"NickP"  wrote in message
news:1107986651.728560.283040{at}g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>I do not support older male teachers having sex with underage females.
> I know that sounds sexist considering the title of my message, but it
> isn't and here's why:  the psycological impact on females is COMPLETELY
> DIFFERENT than on males.  I know first hand, as I had sexual
> experiences with older women at a young age.   I loved it.  It boosted
> my self-esteem, whereas for girls, it wrecks it.   Boys always
> fantasize about older, sexually mature females.  I can almost guarantee
> with 100% certainty that the boys always feel like mega-studs, and were
> the instigators of the whole thing. Okay, so maybe it makes the boys a
> little pervy, but they were probably pervs to start with.  These women
> may go to jail, have their careers ruined, and feel tremendous shame
> after getting caught, but I assure anyone reading this that the boys
> WERE IN NO WAY HARMED AT ALL, unless you believe they were harmed by
> losing their virginity in this fashion.  They will probably never get
> beat up at school again.
> I forget which comedian said it, but their opinion on this subject was:
> "Where were these teachers when I was in school!?"
>

You can only speak for yourself which of course you did, however you make
some major sweeping assumptions which you are trying to represent as facts.
You present no evidence that other boys are NOT harmed by teacher pupil
sexual liasons and neither do you present any evidence to support your claim
that girl pupils who have
 sexual liasons with male teachers results in their self esteem being
wrecked. Therefore I'll put down your post as belonging exclusively in the
'nudge, nudge, wink,wink,' catagory of
a juvenile and immature mind.

 Phil




--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 2/9/05 10:43:48 PM ---