Hyerdahl3 wrote:
> >Subject: Maureen Dowd is finally starting to realize the cold,
painful
> >truth...
> >From: "Rafer" robertclayson4{at}yahoo.com
> >Date: 1/14/2005 11:09 AM Pacific Standard Time
> >Message-id: 
>
> >
> >.=2E.that American women like her have been undesirable, unwanted
> >creatures for some time now.
> >
> >And that now they are in a hole.
>
> I don't see the logic here.  If Dowd is "undesirable" and
"unwanted"
isn't it
> better that she has a career?  :-)

Parg, you're a genius!  You're thinking precisely like me at this
instant! :-)

You're absolutely right.  One of the feedback loops of feminism
is that as women gained more income independance they often
became less attractive and nurturing causing them to be
even more focused upon their work and livelihood.

That's workaholism: People often enjoy their work to the detriment
of their personal relationships causing them to throw themselves
even more into their work.

It's a personality disorder.  People who eat because they're
depressed because they're fat aren't happy. People who overwork because
they're lonely aren't happy.  Women who throw themselves into
feminism because of their dissatisfation with men AREN'T HAPPY!!!

Ironically, many feminists wind up with second rate jobs because
they carry their self-centered victim-entitlement attitude into
workplaces that don't have the support structures to enable
such attitudes.  You probably shouldn't have had the princess
attitude as a file clerk at the law office.  You could
have gotten away with it, somewhat, in government employment
(but even then, you're not the right color as race is beginning
to trump gender in such office politics.)

In the meantime, the red states keep a-winning elections.

regards,
Mark Sobolewski



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 2/11/05 2:44:26 PM ---