Andre Lieven wrote:
> (mark_sobolewski{at}yahoo.com) writes:
> > Hyerdahl3 wrote:
> >> >From: Mark Sobolewski mark_sobolewski{at}yahoo.com
> Well, if you mean my posts that appear " angry ", understand that
> I always know why I'm writing what I'm writing, and such posts are
> constructed to display my deep disdain at the loons, bigots and
> sexists. Were I really emotionally affected by reading or writing
> such posts, I'm sure my S/O would notice ( As she's standing within
> a half metre, as I write this, for example ). Rather, I often call
> her in to hear a funny post, or a particularly loony one. And, if
> she didn't like me doing that, she'd tell me.

Yet here you make a fundamental mistake by walking into
Parg's trap: Why should you disdain sexists?  Isn't this
largely now proven to be a total joke?  Feminists are
the biggest sexists of all claiming that women deserve
special pity credits ahead of men.  So-called egalitarians
are living in la-la land trying to believe that most
people who desire sexism and feminists and hardcore
traditionalists are somehow all going to meld into true
egalitarians overnight AND balance that with biological
necessities.

We can quibble over the meaning of the word sexist such
as "chauvanist" or a bigot.

> > As Lincoln once said: You can fool
> > all of the people some of the time and all of the people some
> > of the time but not all of the people all of the time.
> > Whoever is right: Me, you, Andre, etc. I believe will be proven
> > with time.  God will get the job done in whatever mysterious
> > way is required.
>
> Well, some of us may not want to wait that long....
>
> And, " The Lord helps those, who help themselves... "

A hypocrite doesn't put endless energy into rationalizing
away discrepencies in their positions without implying, to
themselves, just how rediculous they are being!

Parg's rage is due mostly to her subconscious realization of
just how morally bankrupt her position is but to try to
sell it off now and cut her losses would be equally
destructive.

Can we blame her?  What does she have if she sells this all off?
She would just be an old bittergirl with little of the precious
money that she has worshipped all of these years and no
moral authority at that.  So she seeks (like the US pension
system) to try to drag down some poor naive young egotistical
women with her.

The fact she's here arguing with us also implies there aren't
many takers.  I know of many angry feminists whose daughters
are going to church and throwing on makeup with abandon
as a 'rebellious' statement and even an awakening of values.
These young women believe that if feminism was about freeing
them then they should have a right to be free of feminism too.

I wouldn't be surprised if Parg's daughter is some happy
housewife of some wrench jockey in California.

> Yes, Carole Ann proves, time and time again, that Festering
Femmeroids
> *hate* actual equality. So, lets not offer them what they don't want.
>
> Burqua time !

Ironically, as such feminists tore down with both arms the pillars
of western civilization (almost similar to Samson) they have
undermined chivalry at the same time.  Many women are now scared
****less of the dog-eat-dog "capitalist" "equal" world they've
inherited.

> > As I said in another thread, your agenda hasn't helped to make
> > women's lives better or "happy" but to provide them with
"equality".
> > They aren't the same thing as you realize.  Most women,
> > including Maureen Dowd, probably don't want equality with you. :-)
>
> Nor based on their hysterical screeds about how bad it is that
> men don't find them " captivating "... Note what the root word
> there is...

regards,
Mark Sobolewski



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 2/11/05 6:44:36 PM ---