In a message of , Jesse Dooling (1:167/200) writes: 
 JD> Hi.
 JD>        The easy multiple volume capability of ARJ is THE thing that 
 JD> makes me
 JD> use ARJ over other archivers. That's just totally great the way ARJ does
 JD> multiple volumes. I use ARJ for all the files on my BBS since it's so 
 JD> much
 JD> better for maintenance, possibilities and command line flexibility. 
Thank you for the comments.  That is why I will continue to enhance ARJ along 
with JAR.
Regards,
Robert
 
--- msged 2.07
---------------