TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: linuxhelp
to: Geo.
from: Adam Flinton
date: 2003-05-10 17:47:50
subject: Re: Is Windows 2003 Server really faster than Linux?

From: Adam Flinton 


Oh OK it was the "ext3 is the only choice" comment I was querying.

Adam

>>>out with a simple power failure. In a fileserver you have to be able to
>>>count
>>>on the file system coming back up after a hard poweroff. Fileservers are
>>>where everyone stores their data, the file system is critical. ext3 is
>
> the
>
>>>only choice.
>>>
>>
>>Why? I've tried (on a variety of work PC'es) the other 3 jfs'es & we did
>>  "turn off while buzy" tests. ReiserFS, XFS & IBM
JFS all seemed to
>>handle it fine. I think (but I'd have to check our test docs) that for
>>us on that machinery XFS was the fastest.
>
>
> the filesystem that was suggested was ext2, that was what I was disagreeing
> with, not RFS or XFS or JFS but ext2.
>
> Geo.
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/1.45)
SEEN-BY: 633/267 270
@PATH: 379/1 106/1 2000 633/267

SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.