-=> Quoting Mike Roberts to Nancy Backus on 12-26-07  16:37 <=-

 MR> Re: upgrade  was: BW setup.
 MR> By: NANCY BACKUS to JAMES BRADLEY on Mon Dec 24 2007 10:36 pm
 
 > If you did decide to go to 2.30, your registration key for 2.20 will
 > still work with it.  I've got the newer one sitting on the computer,
 > never installed... since 2.20 works just fine for me, I never did pursue
 > it either...   But, if I changed my mind, there still is that option.

 MR> Is 2.30 the 386 version? How did George package that? Was it like 2
 MR> exe's in one or was the 386 version a totally different package.

2.20 and then 2.30 came in three distinct versions, separate packages. 
There was _DOS, _386 and _OS2.  The 386 version was 32-bit, and had
access to more memory so could handle longer messages.  It required a
separate registration from the DOS or the OS2 versions.  I never used
the _386 version, as the straight DOS one was sufficient for my needs.

 MR> I registered all my BW stuff, but lost my reg for the copy of the 386
 MR> version. I tried the crack ( I hope I don't disappoint anybody ( no
 MR> disrespect to George, as I always registered all my bw stuff including
 MR> the doors to run the BBS.) I just could not get it too work. I thought
 MR> it might timeslice better. 

There really isn't much difference in functionality between _DOS and
_386, from what I heard.  I dug up an old FAQ to check my memory.  Dunno
anything about timeslicing, though.  :)

ttyl       neb

... Just when I make ends meet, someone moves one !|

___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.20

--- ViaMAIL!/WC v1.60d