Hyerdahl wrote:
> Grizzlie Antagonist wrote:
>> On 29 Mar 2005 08:17:01 -0800, "Hyerdahl" wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>JerryWong wrote:
>>>> The fundamental theorem of men and women is as follows:
>>>>
>>>> Part 1
>>>> Every woman needs a man but not every man needs a woman.
>>>
>>>That doesn't make much sense to me, since women are...today...doing
>>>everything men are doing PLUS they can gestate their own family,
> quite
>>>without any particular man. She is the unit. He is the other.
>
>> Not in my office, Puke.
>
> Ah, but IN mine, Dave Sim. :-)
>>
>> We got something like 12 assignments and eight men and four women to
>> fill them. Except that the four women are always out on maternity
>> leave and/or sick leave or whatever, and the eight of us are always
>> scrambling to cover for them.
>
> So, get rid of them. :-)



Well, if he did that enough times, then he'd eventually have to hire
Men to replace them, Wouldn't he? He doesn't want to do that, because
he doesn't want to pay them. He wants part-time workers who will forego
benefits. So, as part of a management profession, he pretends to be the
pawn of powers higher than himself. Bellyaching is just part of the
helpless act.

Gay GA is a typical working class turned middle class scab who's just
sucking up and chanting his boss's script. He dreams of one day
becoming one of those "successful" old men with the blue blood side
parts and the wooden teeth. He's just piping the anti-labor
propaganda...





- - -

"And who will save you now?", chuckled the evil Republican.
The oppressed prisoner threw back his head and yelled:

Turin


I have such sites to show you...
------------------------
http://members.fortunecity.com/turinturambar/
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/Men_First/
------------------------

"He who changeth, altereth, misconstrueth, argueth with, deleteth, or
maketh a lie about these words or causeth them to not be known shall
burn in hell forever and ever...."

-----


>> In my office, women really aren't doing anything OTHER THAN
gestating
>> or finding other reasons to take off work, and I suspect that's the
>> way it is in other offices.
>>
> Suspect away, but that doesn't mean that my neice will be darning
your
> nephew's socks any time soon. :-)
> (edit)
>>
> >You have not offered any "empirical evidence", and my
evidence will
>>>clearly show that women can and do exist without men. My evidence
> is
>>>widows. Widows all over the world raise their families without a
> man
>>>as head of that family.
>>>
>>> On the other hand, many> men over the ages have had spectacular
>>>results in the fields of medicine, math and physics not to mention
>>>chemistry without the meddling of women.
>>>
>>>Women scientists, chemists and physicists don't particularly care
>>>whether or not you want them there.
>>
>> Well, you see, Puke; that's not quite true.
>
> Sure it is Dave Sim.
>
>> Women who file sex discrimination lawsuits - and as you know, there
>> are quite a number of them that are filed - inevitably include among
>> their language the allegation that the men in the office or some
male
>> supervisor created a "hostile work environment" directed
toward the
>> female plaintiff.
>>
>> What those women are saying, of course, is that they care very
>> passionately and very deeply about what their male colleagues think
>> about them - and, of course, employers are often compelled to spend
>> money on "sensitivity training" to change such allegedly hostile
>> attitudes.
>>
>> So yes, Puke; those female scientists and chemists care very much
>> about what JerryWong thinks about them, and so do you.
>>
> Nah. It's all handled within our social policy these days, Dave.
> Women
> have never been freer to do as they please, and they don't seem
> interested in
> being the second sex anymore. Boys can no longer BE boys at the
> expense of
> everyone else, and what they think about that is...totally
irrelevant.
>
>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> grizzlieantagonist{at}yahoo.com
>>
>> "Ladies and gentlemen - let's have a round of applause for tonight's
> player of the game - FRAN-CIS-CO SAN-N-N-N-TOS!
>> - Brian Anthony (P.A. announcer at Grizzlie Stadium), June 11,
> 2004
>>
>>
>> "Men are qualified for civil liberty in exact proportion to their
> disposition to put moral chains upon their own appetites; in
proportion
> as their love of justice is above their rapacity; in proportion as
> their soundness and sobriety of understanding is above their vanity
and
> presumption; in proportion as they are more disposed to listen to the
> counsels of the wise and good, in preference to the flattery of
knaves.
> Society cannot exist unless a controlling power upon will and
appetite
> be placed somewhere, and the less of it there is within, the more
there
> must be without. It is ordained in the eternal constitution of things
> that men of intemperate minds cannot be free. Their passions forge
> their fetters."
>>
>> - Edmund Burke, Letter to a Member of the National Assembly
> (1791)



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/31/05 4:47:58 AM ---