wrote in message
news:982537191.3a9053e7a4128@webmail.cotse.com...

> >> Due to the fact that Supernews screwed up and can't fix the problem
until
> >> around Tuesday when their abuse department (who apparently are the only
one's
> >> who can unlock my account) I'm forced to use a Cotse account.  Whch
isn't
> >> really a big deal, I'm actually thinking about ditching the Supernews
account
> >> anyway due to not only this occurrence, but past shortcomings and their
> >> ongoing inefficiency.  But that's not why I'm posting so let me get to
the
> >> point.
>
> >All of this sounds like a personal problem, to me.
>
> I imagine you spend most of your time going around and imagining personal
> problems in people.  Perhaps it's because you can't find or have trouble
> relating to people.

Still lacking reading comprehension skills, aren't you?  I said "sounds
like", it's an observation, dumbass.

> >In any event, I really
> >don't give a flying fuck at a rolling doughnut what your problems are.
>
> Then why are you imagining me having them in the first place?

Imagining what?

> >> I took a few days off, from just life in general.  I spent one entire
day
> >> just sleeping, reading, and pretty much doing nothing productive.
Currently
> >> I'm at a resort in Spokane.  Relaxing, drinking cold mexican beer
(Corona to
> >> be precise), and just thinking at the laptop.  I ate take out Chinese
> >> dinner, it was alright, at the end of the meal I broke open the fortune
> >> cookie to find that I had no fortune.  No silly little cliche, no
> >> misdirection riddle, nothing.  And it started me thinking about certain
> >> things, like why people on Usenet flame each other.
>
> >Because we can, moron.
>
> You can also kill yourself, moron.

If you are so bored, leave, dumbshit.

> >> So why are you flaming?  Now I know a lot of you will try bellowing
> >> entertainment at the top of yer sore lungs, but it just doesn't ring
true. I
> >> mean maybe you can explain how stupidly trying to bring a person down
to
> >> build yerself up can be entertaining.  Perhaps if you don't know how to
> >> interact socially like normal people that's gratifying in one way or
> >> another, but I think for most people it's simply not true.
>
> >Most of us know -how- the game is played.  It's not played to
specifically
> >anger anyone, though if it happens, so what?  If you don't know how to
play,
> >you'll leave with your tail between your legs soon enough.  Others, like
> >you, don't demonstrate enough intelligence to leave when you -do- get
> >offended.
>
> It's obvious that you have some troubles paying attention as I just said
that I
> don't care, that it doesn't affect me.

Sure, boy.  If it didn't "affect" you, why are you explaining all your
problems?

> >It's all "one-upmanship", the man with the better line wins.  If you
haven't
> >figured this out, you really have no business even getting -into- the
game,
> >dumbass.
>
> Not even close to being true.  A lot of times it's simply a  matter of
> convincing yourself or someone else that you're "better" in some way.  For
> instance let's say someone flames me, then I flame them back using better
> insults and a much higher grade of wit.  Then they flame me back in a 3rd
grade
> level sort of way and I don't respond.  Do they win, or do I?  You see,
it's a
> fuzzy line.  They could always claim SPNAK even though they were out
witted and
> their slurpers could help to promote their cowardice.  It's all a matter
of
> perspective.  I mean I was voted the worst flamer.  Why was I voted the
worst
> flamer?  To attack me.  Any award that is voted on, or nominated by an
> individual against their opponent is using it as a means of attack.  You
may
> have noticed recently that Vinny was nominated for several awards because
of
> his actions towards me.  Did I nominate him for any of those awards?  Of
course
> not, it's not my position to do so.  I have not been weakened to where I
would
> need to use such a cowardly based tactic to attack someone.

You don't get a damn thing, dumbass.  It's all about the specific line
stated.  Each new conversation is a new "game".

You haven't been weakened, you never had any strength to start with.

> >> You see the "game" to me seems pointless now.  Why?  Because I don't
care
> >> anymore.  I've been lying to myself for a few months now, trying to
make
> >> myself care.  But I can't hide the truth anymore.  When any of you
people
> >> try and flame me, I feel nothing.  Even when I create the most savoring
> >> flame worthy
>
> >If you feel something other than entertained, stupid, you aren't playing
the
> >game properly.  Most of the time, I laugh.
>
> Your posts are pretty laughable, huh?

PKB, boy.

> >I've laughed at you when you
> >first stuck your head in here.
>
> What group are you talking about newbie?  Or do you even know?  See, this
is
> probably what annoys me the most, stupid people.  I mean, it's like all
the
> good debaters and flamists are history, they've all moved on to other
groups or
> simply grew out of it and people like this d00d are all that's left.  I
mean
> he's so fuckin stupid he doesn't even realize this is being posted to
about a
> dozen or so groups.

In the group *I* am in.  You came in to MY domain.  You figure it out,
dumbass.

> >I've done nothing but laugh at you since
> >then.  I probably won't ever do anything but laugh at you.  You've been
> >pathetic from the start.
>
> It's too bad there isn't a Mojo Jojo award cause then you'd have something
to
> show for your stupidity.

Still watching cartoons, boy?  My -kids- are beyond the Powerpuff Girls and
have been for years.  The only reason I know what you are talking about is
because my nephews are still of an age to watch that crap.

> >You don't make me angry, you don't upset me, and
> >you don't get on my nerves.  NONE of your "goals" have worked.
>
> If that were so true why bother telling me so?  I mean there's a
difference
> between what I did and what you're doing.  What I did was openly and non
> directively say that flaming doesn't affect me.  You are specifically
directing
> a defense towards my words rather than just speak from an open platform.
For
> instance if say Checkmate were to post something to me and I responded
directly
> to him and told HIM that HE did not bother me it's obvious that he did,
> otherwise I wouldn't be trying to use it as a defensive tactic.

No difference at all.  You are in here claiming your immunity to such
things.  You have repeatedly made claims about getting under someone else's
skin while never realizing that you are nothing more than laughable to any
and all involved.

> >If you had anything to say that was truly entertaining, I'd be
> >laughing -with- you, even if you pulled it ON ME, something you have yet
to
> >do.
>
> You know, I don't recall ever having directed a flame towards you, your
nic is
> completely unfamiliar to me.  Although I do often forget about the people
I
> flame against (they just aren't really worth the bother).  I don't think
I've
> ever directly attacked you.  I guess what I'm trying to say is who the
hell are
> you and what did you ever do to keep my attention for more than 38
seconds?
> Overlooking your recent attempt to humor me with your obvious lack of
intelect.
>
> >> fodder for you to attack me with I still can't feel anything.  And
perhaps
> >> that's the real reason I started trolling and creating chaos in the
first
> >> place.  I wanted to feel attacked.  Because in real life, I can't
manage that
> >> emotion, I'm too well liked by people.  Here on the Inet, I can lie, I
can
> >> hide behind a name without a face.  When you don't have to look me in
the
> >> eyes you don't have to think twice about attacking me.
>
> >Boy, in the flame groups, we -especially- attack those we know.
>
> I'm sure you'd attack a stuffed teddy bear if you thought it'd help you to
> relieve some of that pent up anger that's plaguing you.  I know why you
flame
> little one, you flame because of yer life.  You get shit on all day long
in
> real life so you come to the Inet to try and equalize the pressure.  If it
> weren't for the Inet, you'd have probably killed yourself months ago.

It's a -game-, dumbass.  If any of it bothered me, I'd have quit ten or more
years ago.

> >> Does that mean I'm not going to post to Usenet anymore?  No, I'll still
post.
> >> I'll still flame people to.  But from now on, it's on my terms.  If
someone
>
> >You need to -start- flaming, Bed Wetter.  Nothing I've seen out of you to
> >date even comes close.
>
> And what date would that be little one?  Last week?  I mean I'm all for
> bandwagon jumpers who think the entire history of Usenet spans over three
> months, but come on, try and get it figured the fuck out.

ANY date.  Try since your conception.

> >> tries to flame me or claim SPNAK, they only lose.  Why?  Because I
don't
> >> care.
>
> >For the same reason, anyone you claim SPANK on can shrug it off because
> >you've not managed it.
>
> I don't believe in SPANK, I think it's a cowardly tactic when you believe
in
> it.  I sometimes use it in a trolling sense if I want to invoke mass
posting,
> but that's it.

Bullshit.  You've claimed it again and again.

No, I will not look it up.  You've made the claim, do your own homework.

> >> And there's no reason to respond to something that doesn't invoke
anything in
> >> you.  That's why I will always win.  Because I can guarantee that
whenever I
> >> flame you, you will always respond to me.  Don't expect too many
followups
> >> though, I don't "entertain" losers.
>
> >> One more thing, some of you are flaming because you are trying to win
> >> something.  A war.  What is the purpose of winning that war?  You don't
know,
> >> do you?  See I know.  I know that the reason you fight is because you
want
> >> to be able to speak out the way you want, in a forum that you can claim
as
> >> your own.  What you all fail to realize is that it's a pointless
endeavor.
> >> You can already post whatever you want, think whatever you want, and
believe
> >> whatever you want.  You're fighting over an empty fortune cookie.
>
> >That isn't an empty fortune cookie, that's your brain pan.  In the same
> >state of matter deprivation.
>
> You know you started out with nothing, and guess what?  You still have
most of
> it.

Old line.  Overused line.  Not that good to begin with.

> >Get over it, moron.
>
> If you're not fucking up, you're not doing anything.  You might want to
keep
> that in mind.

I fuck up all the time.  It's simply a matter of convincing her to get on
top.