From: Adam <""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the field.near
the bridge">

Rich wrote:
>    Divert?


Yes divert. A really great job. How to answer a question with more
questions rather than make a statement.

> Why did you switch to discussing apple's server product when we were
discussing someone using the client product.

OSX is OSX & it's a *ix & so it runs server tasks...in what way
does that make it so different from any copy of OSX running server tasks?

Gosh my mate who uses OSX runs things such as "apache" &
"mySQL" on his as well as java app servers & it's just OSX
which is good at server tasks because it's a solid *ix.


> Someone who never mentioned *ix at all or have you forgotten?
>

It's a *ix vs windows fight & I can't see Windows winning against *ix.

Adam


> Rich
>
>   "Ad"  wrote in message
news:45d0c09e$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>   Rich wrote:
>   >    You do realize you are quoting apple's marketing for their server
>   > product not their client.  Very different product.  Also, how little
>   > exactly is apple's server used?  Do you know?
>   >
>
>   Also is Rich codeward for "divert divert divert!!!!"
>
>   To answer you questions (though they have nothing to do with wether OSX
>   is a *ix)
>
>   "You do realize you are quoting apple's marketing for their server
>   product not their client."
>
>   Yes &? What has that to do with whether OSX is a *ix?
>
>
>   "Also, how little exactly is apple's server used?"
>
>   &? What has that to do with whether OSX is a *ix?
>
>   "Do you know?"
>
>   &? What has that to do with whether OSX is a *ix?
>
>   Why not just say "OK OSX is just a shiny *ix"?
>
>   Adan

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5