(mark_sobolewski{at}yahoo.com) writes:
> Andre Lieven wrote:
>> "bluesmama" (onebluesmama{at}gmail.com) shoots herself in the foot,
> again:
>> > Mark Sobolewski wrote:
>> >> I think women increasingly are working more and more as
>> >> social safety nets crash down in the United States
>> >> and even in Europe.
>> >>
>> >> For every handout that most women have gotten due to feminism,
>> >> there's usually been another hand taking something away:
>> >> Women got higher pay in the workplace and in exchange, often
>> >> wound up having to wait years (during their prime childbirth
>> >> years) to compete for professional men to marry.
>> >> Women got special political victim status, but to achieve it,
>> >> racial minorities were needed to build a coalition resulting
>> >> in racial violence in the states that women are
>> >> always in fear of (check out most inner city office
>> >> complexes in the US and see how many women walk around
>> >> past dusk...)
>> >>
>> >> Family court bashing men?  Other hand: welfare state
>> >> robbing working women to pay for unwed mothers.
>> >>
>> >> Men built stuff.  You gals just squandered any power you had.
>> >>
>> >> regards,
>> >> Mark Sobolewski
>> >
>> > The most important things in life can neither be built nor bought.
>>
>> Great ! So, we can just do away with all " equal pay " rules, and
>> other rules by which employees who work fewer hours and years get
>> the pay equal to the more productive workers.
>>
>> "Bluesmama" says that women don't need money.
>>
>> Works for me ! 
>>
>> Andre
>
> One of the moments I had where my head spun with
> the question: "Why EVER did someone think they
> should be allowed to vote?" was when open golddiggers
> or materialistic women who regarded men as ATM machines
> would insult a man (oftentimes, me :-) by accusing
> him of being "cheap" as if the man should feel bad.

Amazing, innit ? Its really something that women believe, falsely,
that they have any right to criticise anyone else's " cheapness ",
when they're *leading* the charge towards " gimme more free stuff ".

But, watch the day time shows where they do paternity tests, and
show how many women don't know who the daddy is, but they'll still
get up on their hind legs and bleat " be a man ! " at whoever their
latest suspect guy is.

Perhaps the first error was in not telling women, the first times
some bleated that kind of thing, " shut up, you know nothing about
being a man. ".

'Cause the Feminist " I can have it all " sorts genuinely have no
clue about men, and have precious little about being a woman, as
opposed to being a grrl-child, yet no one steps up and points out
that their empress not only is buck nekkid, but hasn't even ever
seen a Polaroid of a sarong...

> Sheesh!  That's like a thief yelling out at people how
> "paranoid" they are for locking their car doors. :-)

It fairly boggles the healthy mind, don't it ? But, as we
well know here, Feminists surely havn't ever seen a Polaroid
of one of those, either. 

Andre

--
" I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. "
                                    The Man Prayer, Red Green.


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/31/05 5:44:34 PM ---