| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: SAUDIS RULE! SAUDIS RULE! |
Lawyers hope to introduce 'no fault' divorce to New York By MICHAEL HILL, AP ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) - New York would be added to the long list of states with "no-fault" divorce, if a lawyers' group gets its way. The state Bar Association says New York is the only state lacking some version of a no-fault divorce law, in which a spouse suing for divorce does not have to prove their partner did something wrong. Though efforts to make divorce easier in New York have failed in the past, the attorneys are making a new push to put a no-fault law on the books. Proponents say contested cases under the current system can extend bad marriages, encourage dishonest court testimony and can be invasive for couples. "It causes such misery," said Manhattan attorney Harold A. Mayerson. "I have to sit here with clients all the time ... and I have to say, 'I'm sorry, but I have to be a bit voyeuristic in your life. What's your sex life like? Did you sleep with this guy in the last year? If you didn't, why not?' Who wants that?" Grounds for divorce in New York currently require one of the spouses to be found "at fault" of serious misconduct like adultery, abandonment or cruel and inhuman treatment. However, couples who reach consent agreements can be granted a divorce after living apart for a year. A bit more than a three-quarters of the 62,530 divorce filings last year statewide were uncontested, a large number of them involving consent agreements. No-fault laws became popular around the nation beginning in the '60s and '70s. A no-fault bill was introduced to the New York state Legislature in 1989, but it stalled in the face of opposition from religious lobbyists who felt it devalued the sanctity of marriage and domestic advocates who worried it might be unfair to women. "By the '80's, virtually every jurisdiction in the country except New York had some form of no fault," said lawyer Alton L. Abramowitz. Abramowitz helped write proposed no-fault legislation with other members of the state bar that would allow for divorces when a marriage has "broken down irretrievably." While it might seem counterintuitive for lawyers to want to streamline a process that makes them money, Abramowitz said the current system is rife with problems. He said under the current "at-fault" system, couples routinely conspire to make up a fault - like "We haven't had sexual relations in a year" - to get a divorce. It's also common for spouses to circumvent New York law by establishing residency in neighboring states with no-fault laws. The New York City bar has urged the Legislature to pass a no-fault law and the state Women's Bar Association reversed its longstanding opposition to no fault last fall. In the latest coup for no-fault proponents, New York Chief Judge Judith Kaye mentioned it favorably in her State of the Judiciary address this week. "After long and careful reflection, I have come to see that requiring strict `fault' grounds may well simply intensify the bitterness between the parties, wasting resources, hurting children, driving residents to other states for a divorce and delaying the inevitable dissolution of the marriage," Kaye said. Kaye urged the Legislature to revisit the issue, but told lawmakers that any changes they make must take into account the best interests of children caught up in a divorce. Support for no fault is by no means universal. Gloria Jacobs, of the domestic relations law task force for the state chapter of the National Organization for Women, said no fault could be economically bad for women in cases where husbands are the breadwinners. She said it could take away the monied spouse's incentive to settle. "Moving out becomes grounds for divorce without resolving any of the other issues," she said. Dennis Poust of the New York State Catholic Conference said that in cases where there is no abuse or other recognized grounds for divorce, the one-year waiting period seems to be working fine. "We would hope that people who go into marriages see it as more than just an agreement to be dissolved at a moment's notice," Poust said. "... If it ends, it should be done with a lot of reflection and, hopefully, counseling." The state bar is hoping a legislator will take up a no fault bill this session. That has yet to happen, though the heads of the state Senate and Assembly judiciary committees said this week they support no fault. On the Net: State bar: http://www.nysba.org/ New York state chapter of NOW http://www.nownys.com/ 02/13/05 11:28 EST Copyright 2005 The Associated Press. The information contained in the AP news report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press. All active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL. --- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 2/14/05 2:08:55 AM ---* Origin: MoonDog BBS, Brooklyn,NY, 718 692-2498, 1:278/230 (1:278/230) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786 @PATH: 278/230 10/345 106/1 2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.