04 Apr 96 00:21, Paul Edwards wrote to andrew clarke:

 >> Or simply create a variable on the stack. and move your return value
 >> there and return it.

 ac>> Yeah, seems like the only solution.  Seems a bit wasteful
 ac>> though.  :-)

 > Declare the stack variable as register, or switch optimization on,
 > etc, and see if it really is wasteful after all.  BFN.  Paul.

I meant wasteful as far as writing the source code goes.  Most likely the
compiler will sort out the mess in the end. 

--- Msgedsq/2 3.30