> 
->  DD>> Ad hominem abusive usually involves insulting or belittling one's
->  DD>> opponent, but
->  DD>> can also involve pointing out factual but ostensible character
flaws or
->  DD>> actions
->  DD>> which are irrelevant to the opponent's argument. This tactic is
->  DD> logically
->  DD>> fallacious because insults and even true negative facts about the
->  DD>> opponent's
->  DD>> personal character have nothing to do with the logical merits of
the
->  DD>> opponent's
->  DD>> arguments or assertions.

 
->  EH>> Since that is all you do WRT anyone right of Mao, you have no
standing
->  EH>> to lecture anyone on this issue.
-> 
->  DD> What? Post a definition of ad hominem? Remind people of what is
going on?
-> 
-> If you think your attacks on me or anyone else here is not ad hom, you
are
-> seriously delusional.
-> 
->  DD> BTW - the statement "Since that is all you do WRT anyone right of
Mao" is
-> a
->  DD> scurrilous lie and merely your opinion - which probably smells as
bad as
->  DD> your
->  DD> breath after a hard night of boozing with your boyfriends.
-> 
-> Your "hard night of boozing with your boyfriends" comment is a
scurrilous lie.
-> I neither drink or have "boyfriends."
-> 
-> You are full of ad hom.
-> 
And do you realize what you are full of?

--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5