Hello Richard!

30 May 10 16:45, you wrote to me:

 RW> YEp, and more the fool he if he chooses not to heed some
 RW> good advice on that front.  ONe can understand it with a 15
 RW> year old that bares his/her soul and life to others on
 RW> facebook and myspace, but adults should know better.

and the sad thing is, he will continue to do so.

 RC>> The point here is Richard, is that this man should not be casting
 RC>> judgement onto others, when he hasnt a moral or ethical leg to
 RC>> stand on. I have never been in jail or placed under arrest, I will
 RC>> be damned if I am going to be judged by someone who has, because I
 RC>> dont formulate my views as he does and possess the same opinions.

 RW> We do indeed have the "people in glass houses" thing going
 RW> on here a bit, granted.  But I've known people whom I would
 RW> trust with anything I owned with worse criminal records, at

The big difference here I suspect is that those people arent necessarily
passing judgement upon you..

A bank robber has no business calling a shoplifter a thief.. :)

 RW> least from what I"ve seen posted here from both sides re
 RW> his.  wOuld I do the same for WAyne?  Probably not.  I don't really
 RW> know WAyne.  I'd wish to get to know Wayne personally before making
 RW> that judgment about him.

Wayne picks and casts aside his allies quicker than you can say 1-2-3,
he'll warm up to anyone willing to defend him, and go ice cold if the same
person turns out to not have the same ideology, as you noted, this was my
experience.

 RW> I would hope you don't judge me as harshly as
 RW> you do him, because, although you know some things about him I
 RW> would venture that you don't really know me.  YOu know what you might
 RW> have been able to look up via yahoo and google, and what I've allowed
 RW> to be known about me.  But then, I'm even quite particular about whom
 RW> I will provide my social security number.

On common sense issues, you and I are on the same page, on political
ideology it probably ranges to opposites to middle..

I have no reason to judge you as harshly as I do and have Wayne, for one
you dont have the traits he has to do the things he has in berating others
over different views.

 RC>> If you watch a debate, the foes will seize upon any weaknesses
 RC>> expressed by the other(s), had Wayne been more of a mystery, no
 RC>> weaknesses, its that simple.

 RW> Agreed, this often happens, I just choose for myself, and
 RW> those to whom I give any credence to see the weakness of the ideas
 RW> debated and not the individual.  Did I care that CLinton was a
 RW> philanderer?  No.  Was I aware of this fact when I considered the
 RW> possibility of voting for him in '92? YEs.  Did that fact cause me to
 RW> not mark my ballot for him? No, it had no bearing on that.

I am wary of any Democrat who goes hollywoodish.. Clinton did it, so did
Obama. Kerry had he got elected in 04, was too goofy to be hollywoodish.

Hollywoodish as like they know they are famous and carry on like they are
teen idols, Leif Garrett, David/Shaun Cassidy style..

But to chide you a bit, because the electorate shrugged off his daliances
prior to the 92 Election, it gave tacit approval to his more notable
daliance that stained his Presidency (and a dress) and legal career, most
forget that the Lewinsky affair physically took lace in 95.

==
Ross
Fidonet Feeds Or Fidonet In Your Newsreader: http://www.easternstar.info
E-mail: ross(at)cassell(dot)us | Other Places: http://links.cassell.us
... Bigot: Anyone who's winning an argument with a Democrat.
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20060121