"Dave Drum -> Ross Sauer"  wrote in
news:30530$POL_INC{at}JamNNTPd:

 RS>>> As for that Paul guy, not many people have confidence he can
 DD>   win RS>> the general election this November.

 DD>> Win, lose, or draw he is actually making some good sense. But,
 DD>   then, DD> so did Dick Tricky in some of his speeches. Many can talk
 DD>   the talk. We DD> may see how well he walks the walk. Or not if Jack
 DD>   Conway can climb DD> the steep hill of running against both Jim
 DD>   Bunning's memory and Rand DD> Paul's negative promises.

 RS>> Rand Paul has already stepped in it up to knees, just a day
 DD>   after the RS> primary he goes on Rachel Maddow's show and says
 DD>   restaurant owners RS> shouldn't be required to not discriminate by
 DD>   race, and generally RS> sounding like a typical DC politician.

 DD> OK, so he stepped on his dick. That genie (Civil Rights Act of '64) is
 DD> already out of the bottle. But, I fail to see how favouring going back
 DD> to the bad old days makes him sound like "a typical DC politician".

 DD>  From which orifice did you pull that statement?

It was the rest of the interview with Maddow, where Rand Paul sounded like
pretty much your typical DC politician.

Being evasive, making boilerplate remarks and sounding authoritive and
being a little long-winded.

--- Xnews/5.04.25