| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Is Windows 2003 Server really faster than Linux? |
From: "Geo."
"Robert Comer" wrote in message
news:3ebc4c77$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> That's not quite right Geo, there are other journaling files systems that
> are better than ext3. I would probably (and do) use reiser since it's the
> oldest.
Why was the guy suggesting ext2 then?
> Software based raid 0 is going to be sucky, any of the RAID levels should
> only be done with hardware if you want decent speed.
I agree for all but mirroring, that can be done in software with a pair of
drives quite easily with no noticeable load (except during bootup sync) on
the machine. It's one of the reasons I'm using mirroring on a number of web
servers now, cheap redundancy.
Geo.
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/1.45)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/1 106/1 2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.