"Ed Hulett -> Dave Drum"  wrote in
news:30622$POL_INC{at}JamNNTPd:

 ->>>> I don't claim to be an oilman, but I do know British Petroleum,
 EH>   if ->>> they were a "person" like the Supreme Court said

 EC>>> When did it say that?

 EH>>> Just prior to Sauer confronting former president GHW Bush at a
 EH>>> Sheboygan intersection.

 DD>> Ad hominem abusive usually involves insulting or belittling
 EH>   one's DD> opponent, but
 DD>> can also involve pointing out factual but ostensible character
 EH>   flaws or DD> actions
 DD>> which are irrelevant to the opponent's argument. This tactic is
 EH>   logically DD> fallacious because insults and even true negative
 EH>   facts about the DD> opponent's
 DD>> personal character have nothing to do with the logical merits of
 EH>   the DD> opponent's
 DD>> arguments or assertions.

 EH> Since that is all you do WRT anyone right of Mao, you have no standing
 EH> to lecture anyone on this issue.

Yet another ad hominem attack
That's all you clowns have, since your party is bankrupt financially,
morally and electorally.

--- Xnews/5.04.25