On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:17:59 GMT, "-krp-" 
transparently proposed:

>
>"Dr. Flonkenstein"  wrote in message
>news:pan.2005.02.14.00.54.54.37237{at}localhost.localdomain...
>
>>>> >> >> Kookologists study k00ks like you in AUK.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > Sensable -- since that's where most of the kooks are.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> No, they "are" not there.
>>>> >
>>>> > Depends on what your definition of "are" are.
>>>>
>>>> Depends on what your definition of definition of
"are" are.
>>>
>>> I rest my case.
>>
>> Any mongoloid would have done that a long time before you!
>
>
>And the mongoloids ARE............ In alt.usenet.KOOKS
>
>
Kenny Kakes, when do you actually come up with something other than
your same old worn out shtick of gay lames and Pee Wee Herman
imitations?



--

Kenny Kakes Pangborn displaying his grasp of English:
Message-ID: 

"Shall we confine it to sentence made up of 3 words or less and
monosyllable words to help you out? TYPICAL KOOKINMATE!"


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 2/14/05 1:39:38 PM ---