| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Kludge lines 2/2 |
(Continued from previous message) RS> And presumably its possible to know what you did use program wise RS> in the last 3 years, and work out what algs they use if you want PE> I'm not dead sure. I tried out a variety at one stage, PE> e.g. SQED or something. Depends on how many messages you send out with those. Hardly the end of civilisation as we know it if you sent a total of 5 with one you cant remember, when you consider the microscopic risk of them actually accidentally reusing an MSGID in a single echo which is low volume and which people keep for 3 years. Getting more than a tad anal to worry about. PE> the 150-line limit causes REAL problems but only fixes IMAGINARY problems. RS> Tell that to those using mail readers with 150 line limits. PE> Like who? Real some echoes, look for SLMR or OLX brag lines. Realise that there are lots more who have those turned off or who just read, dont write much. PE> When was the last time you saw one of them complain about PE> not being able to see more than the first 150-lines? Few people are silly enough to post stuff over 150 lines. Doesnt prove a lot. But it was only a couple of weeks ago. PE> I think I'll start making that my own policy, not PE> to read/reply to any more than the first of your PE> multipart messages. Why didn't I think of that before? I basically couldnt give a shit what you rely to. Particularly when its as full of pathetically silly stuff like this one was |-) --- PQWK202* Origin: afswlw rjfilepwq (3:711/934.2) SEEN-BY: 690/718 711/809 934 @PATH: 711/934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.