From: "Joe Barr" 

On Sat, 10 May 2003 22:03:40 -0400, Geo. wrote:

> "Joe Barr"  wrote in message
> news:pan.2003.05.10.22.19.46.959698{at}austin.rr.com...
>
>> Wouldn't it be a hoot if Windows 2003 really were faster than Linux, but
>> nobody believed it because you lie so often, so quickly, so
>> consistantly?
>
> I believe in a software RAID0 setup that W2K3 is faster than linux at
> anything that maxes out the disks.
>
> Geo.

And that view is much reduced from the one MS is trying to sell.  And in
fact is only meaningful to all those folk out there who plan on running a
file server with software RAID 0.

Both of them, probably.  :)


--

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4