On or about: 01-07-08  21:21, Nancy Backus did engage Jean Parrot
regarding, but not limited to: BW setup.

 -=> Quoting Jean Parrot to Nancy Backus on 01-04-08  11:16 <=-
 
 JP> I did not pay attention to this bug in the first  screen that
 JP> BW shows, it is still there. I know that the .rep itself was cured
 JP> and properly too, Dale did fine job too, his was tricking BW in
 JP> doing a proper date stamp. This date in the .qwk name does nothing.

 NB> Correct, it is mostly a cosmetic thing, just the way the reader
 NB> listing of message packets pulls in the date on the file for the user's
 NB> viewing. In the non-fixed reader, that listing merely was eg 05 Jan 10,
 NB> no matter what the actual year was.  Richard fixed it so that it would
 NB> at least be a useful year date, so now the above would be 05 Jan108 or
 NB> whatever the appropriate year was.  The date on the message itself
 NB> shows as 05 Jan 08 or however you configure your reader to show the
 NB> date.  :) 

I'm a little stumped here:

+-- January 9, 2008 ------------------------------------ 06:51:36 --+
| Msg#: 1 of 4                           Read Replied Saved Printed |
| From: Nancy Backus                     Date: 01-07-08  21:21       
|   To: Jean Parrot                      Mark: Reply Save Print Del |
| Subj: BW setup.                                                    
+ Menu ---------------------------------------------  Prev -- Next  +
-=> Quoting Jean Parrot to Nancy Backus on 01-04-08  11:16 <=-

...Is my message screen at the head of your message. As you can see,
"January 9, 2008" *is* todays date, and " Date: 01-07-08 
21:21" seems reasonable. Am I missing something? I still use REPFIX.



... James

___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.20

--- Maximus 3.01