| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Windows 2003 slower than Windows 2000? |
From: "Geo."
I don't know about everyone else but when I get a new version I always
avoid putting it on my biggest baddest production boxes till I'm sure it
can be trusted (which usually doesn't happen until after sp1 or sp2).
Geo.
"Mike '/m'" wrote in message
news:ebbccv8q0rn8lmu7pr68sdvg519c6ckbsi{at}4ax.com...
>
> Why would they install the new OS on slower machines?
>
> /m
>
>
> On Fri, 16 May 2003 19:48:41 -0400, "Geo."
wrote:
>
> >Kinda meaningless without knowing if it's identical hardware.
> >
> >Geo.
> >
> >"Joe Barr" wrote in message
> >news:pan.2003.05.15.20.43.52.824709{at}austin.rr.com...
> >>
> >> Netcraft has some interesting stats/observations about that.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2003/01/21/performance_of_wwwintelcom_att
racting_interest.html
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >
>
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/1.45)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/1 106/1 2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.